By the same authors

From the same journal

From the same journal

Do Hospital Boards matter for better, safer, patient care?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Full text download(s)

Published copy (DOI)

Author(s)

Department/unit(s)

Publication details

JournalSocial science and medicine
DateAccepted/In press - 22 Jan 2017
DateE-pub ahead of print (current) - 24 Jan 2017
Number of pages10
Pages (from-to)1-10
Early online date24/01/17
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Manifest failings in healthcare quality and safety in many countries have focused attention on the role of hospital Boards. While a growing literature has drawn attention to the potential impacts of Board composition and Board processes, little work has yet been carried out to examine the influence of Board
competencies. In this work, we first validate the structure of an established ‘Board competencies’ self assessment instrument in the English NHS (the Board Self-Assessment Questionnaire, or BSAQ). This tool is then used to explore in English acute hospitals the relationships between (a) Board competencies
and staff perceptions about how well their organisation deals with quality and safety issues; and (b) Board competencies and a raft of patient safety and quality measures at organisation level.
National survey data from 95 hospitals (334 Board members) confirmed the factor structure of the BSAQ, validating it for use in the English NHS. Moreover, better Board competencies were correlated in consistent ways with beneficial staff attitudes to the reporting and handling of quality and safety issues (using routinely collected data from the NHS National Staff Survey). However, relationships between Board competencies and aggregate outcomes for a variety of quality and safety measures showed largely inconsistent and non-significant relationships.
Overall, these data suggest that Boards may be able to impact on important staff perceptions. Further work is required to unpack the impact of Board attributes on organisational aggregate outcomes.

Bibliographical note

© 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations