Does Dewey have an “epistemic argument” for democracy?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Author(s)

Department/unit(s)

Publication details

JournalContemporary Pragmatism
DateAccepted/In press - 3 Mar 2018
DatePublished (current) - 2019
Issue number2-3
Volume16
Pages (from-to)217-241
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

The analysis and defence of democracy on the grounds of its epistemic powers is now a well-established, if contentious, area of theoretical and empirical research. This article reconstructs a distinctive and systematic epistemic account of democracy from Dewey's writings. Running like a thread through this account is a critical analysis of the distortion of hierarchy and class division on social knowledge, which Dewey believes democracy can counteract. The article goes on to argue that Dewey’s account has the resources to defuse at least some important forms of the broader charges of instrumentalism and depoliticization that are directed at the epistemic project. The gloomy conviction of the stratified character of capitalist societies and the conflictual character of their politics shapes Dewey’s view of political agency, and this article outlines how this epistemic conception of democracy is deployed as a critical standard for judging and transforming existing political forms but also serves as a line of defence for democratic political forms against violent and authoritarian alternatives.

Bibliographical note

This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details

    Research areas

  • n Dewey, pragmatism, epistemic democracy, democratic theory

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations