By the same authors

From the same journal

From the same journal

Dynamical locality and covariance: What makes a physical theory the same in all spacetimes?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

Dynamical locality and covariance : What makes a physical theory the same in all spacetimes? / Fewster, Chris; Verch, Rainer.

In: Annales Henri Poincare, Vol. 13, No. 7, 11.2012, p. 1613-1674.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

Fewster, C & Verch, R 2012, 'Dynamical locality and covariance: What makes a physical theory the same in all spacetimes?', Annales Henri Poincare, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1613-1674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00023-012-0165-0

APA

Fewster, C., & Verch, R. (2012). Dynamical locality and covariance: What makes a physical theory the same in all spacetimes? Annales Henri Poincare, 13(7), 1613-1674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00023-012-0165-0

Vancouver

Fewster C, Verch R. Dynamical locality and covariance: What makes a physical theory the same in all spacetimes? Annales Henri Poincare. 2012 Nov;13(7):1613-1674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00023-012-0165-0

Author

Fewster, Chris ; Verch, Rainer. / Dynamical locality and covariance : What makes a physical theory the same in all spacetimes?. In: Annales Henri Poincare. 2012 ; Vol. 13, No. 7. pp. 1613-1674.

Bibtex - Download

@article{ae56620e944f45a0a8b8ec7a8b384f82,
title = "Dynamical locality and covariance: What makes a physical theory the same in all spacetimes?",
abstract = "The question of what it means for a theory to describe the same physics onall spacetimes (SPASs) is discussed. As there may be many answers to thisquestion, we isolate a necessary condition, the SPASs property, that shouldbe satisfied by any reasonable notion of SPASs. This requires that if twotheories conform to a common notion of SPASs, with one a subtheory of theother, and are isomorphic in some particular spacetime, then they should beisomorphic in all globally hyperbolic spacetimes (of given dimension). TheSPASs property is formulated in a functorial setting broad enough todescribe general physical theories describing processes in spacetime,subject to very minimal assumptions. By explicit constructions, the fullclass of locally covariant theories is shown not to satisfy the SPASsproperty, establishing that there is no notion of SPASs encompassing allsuch theories. It is also shown that all locally covariant theories obeyingthe time-slice property possess two local substructures, one kinematical(obtained directly from the functorial structure) and the other dynamical(obtained from a natural form of dynamics, termed relative Cauchyevolution). The covariance properties of relative Cauchy evolution and thekinematic and dynamical substructures are analyzed in detail. Calling localcovariant theories dynamically local if their kinematical and dynamicallocal substructures coincide, it is shown that the class of dynamicallylocal theories fulfills the SPASs property. As an application in quantumfield theory, we give a model independent proof of the impossibility ofmaking a covariant choice of preferred state in all spacetimes, for theoriesobeying dynamical locality together with typical assumptions.",
author = "Chris Fewster and Rainer Verch",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1007/s00023-012-0165-0",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "1613--1674",
journal = "Annales Henri Poincare",
issn = "1424-0661",
publisher = "Birkhauser Verlag Basel",
number = "7",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dynamical locality and covariance

T2 - Annales Henri Poincare

AU - Fewster, Chris

AU - Verch, Rainer

PY - 2012/11

Y1 - 2012/11

N2 - The question of what it means for a theory to describe the same physics onall spacetimes (SPASs) is discussed. As there may be many answers to thisquestion, we isolate a necessary condition, the SPASs property, that shouldbe satisfied by any reasonable notion of SPASs. This requires that if twotheories conform to a common notion of SPASs, with one a subtheory of theother, and are isomorphic in some particular spacetime, then they should beisomorphic in all globally hyperbolic spacetimes (of given dimension). TheSPASs property is formulated in a functorial setting broad enough todescribe general physical theories describing processes in spacetime,subject to very minimal assumptions. By explicit constructions, the fullclass of locally covariant theories is shown not to satisfy the SPASsproperty, establishing that there is no notion of SPASs encompassing allsuch theories. It is also shown that all locally covariant theories obeyingthe time-slice property possess two local substructures, one kinematical(obtained directly from the functorial structure) and the other dynamical(obtained from a natural form of dynamics, termed relative Cauchyevolution). The covariance properties of relative Cauchy evolution and thekinematic and dynamical substructures are analyzed in detail. Calling localcovariant theories dynamically local if their kinematical and dynamicallocal substructures coincide, it is shown that the class of dynamicallylocal theories fulfills the SPASs property. As an application in quantumfield theory, we give a model independent proof of the impossibility ofmaking a covariant choice of preferred state in all spacetimes, for theoriesobeying dynamical locality together with typical assumptions.

AB - The question of what it means for a theory to describe the same physics onall spacetimes (SPASs) is discussed. As there may be many answers to thisquestion, we isolate a necessary condition, the SPASs property, that shouldbe satisfied by any reasonable notion of SPASs. This requires that if twotheories conform to a common notion of SPASs, with one a subtheory of theother, and are isomorphic in some particular spacetime, then they should beisomorphic in all globally hyperbolic spacetimes (of given dimension). TheSPASs property is formulated in a functorial setting broad enough todescribe general physical theories describing processes in spacetime,subject to very minimal assumptions. By explicit constructions, the fullclass of locally covariant theories is shown not to satisfy the SPASsproperty, establishing that there is no notion of SPASs encompassing allsuch theories. It is also shown that all locally covariant theories obeyingthe time-slice property possess two local substructures, one kinematical(obtained directly from the functorial structure) and the other dynamical(obtained from a natural form of dynamics, termed relative Cauchyevolution). The covariance properties of relative Cauchy evolution and thekinematic and dynamical substructures are analyzed in detail. Calling localcovariant theories dynamically local if their kinematical and dynamicallocal substructures coincide, it is shown that the class of dynamicallylocal theories fulfills the SPASs property. As an application in quantumfield theory, we give a model independent proof of the impossibility ofmaking a covariant choice of preferred state in all spacetimes, for theoriesobeying dynamical locality together with typical assumptions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867030646&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00023-012-0165-0

DO - 10.1007/s00023-012-0165-0

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 1613

EP - 1674

JO - Annales Henri Poincare

JF - Annales Henri Poincare

SN - 1424-0661

IS - 7

ER -