Earthworm-induced shifts in microbial diversity in soils with rare versus established invasive earthworm populations

Alexandre B. De Menezes, Miranda Tendai Prendergast-Miller, Lynne M. Macdonald, Peter Toscas, Geoff Baker, Mark Farrell, Tim Wark, Alan E. Richardson, Peter H. Thrall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

European earthworms have colonised many parts of Australia, although their impact on soil microbial communities remains largely uncharacterised. An experiment was conducted to contrast the responses to Aporrectodea trapezoides introduction between soils from sites with established (Talmo, 64 A. trapezoides m-2) and rare (Glenrock, 0.6 A. trapezoides m-2) A. trapezoides populations. Our hypothesis was that earthworm introduction would lead to similar changes in bacterial communities in both soils. The effects of earthworm introduction (earthworm activity and cadaver decomposition) did not lead to a convergence of bacterial community composition between the two soils. However, in both soils, the Firmicutes decreased in abundance and a common set of bacteria responded positively to earthworms. The increase in the abundance of Flavobacterium, Chitinophagaceae, Rhodocyclaceae and Sphingobacteriales were consistent with previous studies. Evidence for possible soil resistance to earthworms was observed, with lower earthworm survival in Glenrock microcosms coinciding with A. trapezoides rarity in this site, lower soil organic matter and clay content and differences in the diversity and abundance of potential earthworm mutualist bacteria. These results suggest that while the impacts of earthworms vary between different soils, the consistent response of some bacteria may aid in predicting the impacts of earthworms on soil ecosystems.
Original languageEnglish
JournalFEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY
Volume94
Issue number5
Early online date22 Mar 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2018

Bibliographical note

© FEMS 2018. This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details.

Cite this