By the same authors

From the same journal

Economic analysis of the prevalence and clinical and economic burden of medication error in England

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

Department/unit(s)

Publication details

JournalBMJ Quality & Safety
DateAccepted/In press - 7 Mar 2020
DateE-pub ahead of print (current) - 11 Jun 2020
Number of pages10
Pages (from-to)1-10
Early online date11/06/20
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Objectives
To provide national estimates of the number and clinical and economic burden of medication errors in the National Health Service (NHS) in England.

Methods
We used United Kingdom-based prevalence of medication errors (in prescribing, dispensing, administration and monitoring) in primary care, secondary care and nursing home settings, and associated healthcare resource use, to estimate annual number and burden of errors to the NHS. Burden (health care resource use and deaths) was estimated from harm associated with avoidable adverse drug events (ADEs).

Results
We estimated that 237 million medication errors occur at some point in the medication process in England annually, 71% occurring in primary care. 72% have little/no potential for harm and 66 million are potentially clinically significant. Prescribing in primary care accounts for 34% of all potentially clinically significant errors. Definitely avoidable ADEs are estimated to cost the NHS £98,462,582 per year, consuming 181,626 bed-days, causing/contributing to 1,708 deaths. This comprises primary care ADEs leading to a hospital admission (£83.7 million; causing 627 deaths), and secondary care ADEs leading to a longer hospital stay (£14.8 million; causing 85 deaths; contributing to 1,081 deaths).

Conclusions
Ubiquitous medicines use in health care leads unsurprisingly to high numbers of medication errors, although most are not clinically important. There is significant uncertainty around estimates due to the assumption that avoidable ADEs correspond to medication errors, data quality, and lack of data around longer-term impacts of errors. Data linkage between errors and patient outcomes is essential to progress understanding in this area.

Bibliographical note

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details.

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations