By the same authors

Economic Participation Rights and the All-Affected Principle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

Department/unit(s)

Publication details

JournalGlobal Justice: Theory Practice Rhetoric
DatePublished - 24 Sep 2018
Issue number2
Volume10
Pages (from-to)1-21
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

The democratic boundary problem raises the question of who has democratic participation rights in a given polity and why. One possible solution to this problem is the all-affected principle (AAP), according to which a polity ought to enfranchise all persons whose interests are affected by the polity’s decisions in a morally significant way. While AAP offers a plausible principle of democratic enfranchisement, its supporters have so far not paid sufficient attention to economic participation rights. I argue that if one commits oneself to AAP, one must also commit oneself to the view that political participation rights are not necessarily the only, and not necessarily the best, way to protect morally weighty interests. I also argue that economic participation rights raise important worries about democratic accountability, which is why their exercise must be constrained by a number of moral duties.

Bibliographical note

Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations