By the same authors

From the same journal

From the same journal

Editorial overview: theoretical traditions in social values for sustainability

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

Published copy (DOI)

Author(s)

  • Christopher M. Raymond
  • Jasper O. Kenter
  • Carena J. van Riper
  • Andrea Rawluk
  • Dave Kendal

Department/unit(s)

Publication details

JournalSustainability Science
DatePublished - 2 Sep 2019
Issue number5
Volume14
Number of pages13
Pages (from-to)1173-1185
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

This special feature provides an impression of the plurality of social values for sustainability, taking into account theoretical traditions within mainstream and heterodox economics; positive, social and environmental psychology; human geography; anthropology; sociology; religious and indigenous studies and business management. Papers in this issue respond to questions of: how do we conceptualise social values; how do we integrate or share social values; what are processes for learning about and mechanisms for forming and changing social values; and what are the associations between social values and behaviour or well-being? Consistent with post-normal science, we suggest that there is no one correct way of conceptualising, assessing, integrating or activating social values for sustainability. We present five arguments: (1) the plurality of social values can be conceptualised along many different dimensions, with reference to value, epistemic and procedural lenses; (2) values are nested in different hierarchies, resulting in the potential for different forms of value articulations and pathways of value expression; (3) not all social values are pre-formed and readily drawn upon, instead needing pathways of deliberation or intervention to be activated; (4) social values may change through different processes or pathways of intervention, and; (5) power matters in the formation and assessment of social values. We discuss the tensions that arise when attempting to integrate different perspectives and introduce the notion of ‘navigation’ to begin to address these tensions. Navigation requires scholars to adopt a more critical and reflexive approach to value enquiry than is currently espoused in sustainability science and practice.

Bibliographical note

© Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2019. This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details.

    Research areas

  • Deliberation, Ecosystem services, Environment, Integrated valuation, Non-monetary valuation, Social values

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations