By the same authors

From the same journal

From the same journal

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a structured social coaching intervention for people with psychosis (SCENE): protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Full text download(s)

Published copy (DOI)

Author(s)

  • Domenico Giacco
  • Agnes Chevalier
  • Megan Patterson
  • Thomas Hamborg
  • Rianna Mortimer
  • Yan Feng
  • Martin Paul Webber
  • Penny Xanthopoulou
  • Stefan Priebe

Department/unit(s)

Publication details

JournalBMJ Open
DateAccepted/In press - 15 Oct 2021
DatePublished (current) - 13 Dec 2021
Issue number12
Volume11
Number of pages9
Pages (from-to)1-9
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Introduction People with psychosis tend to have smaller social networks than both people in the general population and other people with long-term health conditions. Small social networks are associated with poor quality of life. Preliminary evidence suggests that coaching patients to increase their social contacts may be effective. In this study, we assessed whether structured social coaching improves the quality of life of patients with psychosis (primary outcome) compared with an active control group, receiving information on local social activities.

Methods and analysis A structured social coaching intervention was developed based on the literature and refined through stakeholder involvement. It draws on principles from motivational interviewing, solution focused therapy and structured information giving. It is provided over a 6-month period and can be delivered by a range of different mental health professionals. Its effectiveness and cost-effectiveness are assessed in a randomised controlled trial, compared with an active control group, in which participants are given an information booklet on local social activities. Participants are aged 18 or over, have a primary diagnosis of a psychotic disorder (International Classification of Disease: F20–29) and capacity to provide informed consent. Participants are assessed at baseline and at 6, 12 and 18 months after individual randomisation. The primary outcome is quality of life at 6 months (Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life). We hypothesise that the effects on quality of life are mediated by an increase in social contacts. Secondary outcomes are symptoms, social situation and time spent in social activities. Costs and cost-effectiveness analyses will consider service use and health-related quality of life.

Ethics and dissemination National Health Service REC London Hampstead (19/LO/0088) provided a favourable opinion. Findings will be disseminated through a website, social media, scientific papers and user-friendly reports, in collaboration with a lived experience advisory panel.

Bibliographical note

© Author(s) (or their
employer(s)) 2021. Re-use
permitted under CC BY.
Published by BMJ.

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations