Effectiveness of tailored digital health interventions for mental health at the workplace: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials

Thirimon Moe-Byrne; Jessie Shepherd; Dorota Merecz-Kot; Marjo Sinokki; Päivi Naumanen; Leona Hakkaart-van Roijen; Christina Van Der Feltz-Cornelis

doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000123

Effectiveness of tailored digital health interventions for mental health at the workplace: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials

Thirimon Moe-Byrne, Jessie Shepherd, Dorota Merecz-Kot, Marjo Sinokki, Päivi Naumanen, Leona Hakkaart-van Roijen, Christina Van Der Feltz-Cornelis

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Mental health problems in the workplace are common and have a considerable impact on employee wellbeing and productivity. Mental ill-health costs employers between £33 billion and £42 billion a year. According to a 2020 HSE report, roughly 2,440 per 100,000 workers in the UK were affected by work-related stress, depression, or anxiety, resulting in an estimated 17.9 million working days lost. We performed a systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the effect of tailored digital health interventions provided in the workplace aiming to improve mental health, presenteeism and absenteeism of employees. We searched several databases for RCTs published from 2000 onwards. Data were extracted into a standardised data extraction form. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Due to the heterogeneity of outcome measures, narrative synthesis was used to summarise the findings. Seven RCTs (eight publications) were included that evaluated tailored digital interventions versus waiting list control or usual care to improve physical and mental health outcomes and work productivity. The results are promising to the advantage of tailored digital interventions regarding presenteeism, sleep, stress levels, and physical symptoms related to somatisation; but less for addressing depression, anxiety, and absenteeism. Even though tailored digital interventions did not reduce anxiety and depression in the general working population, they significantly reduced depression and anxiety in employees with higher levels of psychological distress. Tailored digital interventions seem more effective in employees with higher levels of distress, presenteeism or absenteeism than in the general working population. There was high heterogeneity in outcome measures, especially for work productivity; this should be a focus of attention in future studies.

Original language	English
Article number	e0000123
Number of pages	25
Journal	PLOS Digital Health
Volume	1
Issue number	10
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000123
Publication status	Published - 21 Oct 2022

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

10.1371/journal.pdig.0000123Licence: CC BY

Effectiveness of tailored digital health interventions for mental health at the workplace: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials
© 2022 Moe-Byrne et al.
Final published version, 1.38 MBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{9d6f183204df4660baace0d9d472317c,

title = "Effectiveness of tailored digital health interventions for mental health at the workplace: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials",

abstract = "Mental health problems in the workplace are common and have a considerable impact on employee wellbeing and productivity. Mental ill-health costs employers between £33 billion and £42 billion a year. According to a 2020 HSE report, roughly 2,440 per 100,000 workers in the UK were affected by work-related stress, depression, or anxiety, resulting in an estimated 17.9 million working days lost. We performed a systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the effect of tailored digital health interventions provided in the workplace aiming to improve mental health, presenteeism and absenteeism of employees. We searched several databases for RCTs published from 2000 onwards. Data were extracted into a standardised data extraction form. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Due to the heterogeneity of outcome measures, narrative synthesis was used to summarise the findings. Seven RCTs (eight publications) were included that evaluated tailored digital interventions versus waiting list control or usual care to improve physical and mental health outcomes and work productivity. The results are promising to the advantage of tailored digital interventions regarding presenteeism, sleep, stress levels, and physical symptoms related to somatisation; but less for addressing depression, anxiety, and absenteeism. Even though tailored digital interventions did not reduce anxiety and depression in the general working population, they significantly reduced depression and anxiety in employees with higher levels of psychological distress. Tailored digital interventions seem more effective in employees with higher levels of distress, presenteeism or absenteeism than in the general working population. There was high heterogeneity in outcome measures, especially for work productivity; this should be a focus of attention in future studies.",

author = "Thirimon Moe-Byrne and Jessie Shepherd and Dorota Merecz-Kot and Marjo Sinokki and P{\"a}ivi Naumanen and {Hakkaart-van Roijen}, Leona and {Van Der Feltz-Cornelis}, Christina",

note = "Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 Moe-Byrne et al. ",

year = "2022",

month = oct,

day = "21",

doi = "10.1371/journal.pdig.0000123",

language = "English",

volume = "1",

journal = "PLOS Digital Health",

issn = "2767-3170",

number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effectiveness of tailored digital health interventions for mental health at the workplace

T2 - A systematic review of randomised controlled trials

AU - Moe-Byrne, Thirimon

AU - Shepherd, Jessie

AU - Merecz-Kot, Dorota

AU - Sinokki, Marjo

AU - Naumanen, Päivi

AU - Hakkaart-van Roijen, Leona

AU - Van Der Feltz-Cornelis, Christina

PY - 2022/10/21

Y1 - 2022/10/21

N2 - Mental health problems in the workplace are common and have a considerable impact on employee wellbeing and productivity. Mental ill-health costs employers between £33 billion and £42 billion a year. According to a 2020 HSE report, roughly 2,440 per 100,000 workers in the UK were affected by work-related stress, depression, or anxiety, resulting in an estimated 17.9 million working days lost. We performed a systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the effect of tailored digital health interventions provided in the workplace aiming to improve mental health, presenteeism and absenteeism of employees. We searched several databases for RCTs published from 2000 onwards. Data were extracted into a standardised data extraction form. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Due to the heterogeneity of outcome measures, narrative synthesis was used to summarise the findings. Seven RCTs (eight publications) were included that evaluated tailored digital interventions versus waiting list control or usual care to improve physical and mental health outcomes and work productivity. The results are promising to the advantage of tailored digital interventions regarding presenteeism, sleep, stress levels, and physical symptoms related to somatisation; but less for addressing depression, anxiety, and absenteeism. Even though tailored digital interventions did not reduce anxiety and depression in the general working population, they significantly reduced depression and anxiety in employees with higher levels of psychological distress. Tailored digital interventions seem more effective in employees with higher levels of distress, presenteeism or absenteeism than in the general working population. There was high heterogeneity in outcome measures, especially for work productivity; this should be a focus of attention in future studies.

AB - Mental health problems in the workplace are common and have a considerable impact on employee wellbeing and productivity. Mental ill-health costs employers between £33 billion and £42 billion a year. According to a 2020 HSE report, roughly 2,440 per 100,000 workers in the UK were affected by work-related stress, depression, or anxiety, resulting in an estimated 17.9 million working days lost. We performed a systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the effect of tailored digital health interventions provided in the workplace aiming to improve mental health, presenteeism and absenteeism of employees. We searched several databases for RCTs published from 2000 onwards. Data were extracted into a standardised data extraction form. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Due to the heterogeneity of outcome measures, narrative synthesis was used to summarise the findings. Seven RCTs (eight publications) were included that evaluated tailored digital interventions versus waiting list control or usual care to improve physical and mental health outcomes and work productivity. The results are promising to the advantage of tailored digital interventions regarding presenteeism, sleep, stress levels, and physical symptoms related to somatisation; but less for addressing depression, anxiety, and absenteeism. Even though tailored digital interventions did not reduce anxiety and depression in the general working population, they significantly reduced depression and anxiety in employees with higher levels of psychological distress. Tailored digital interventions seem more effective in employees with higher levels of distress, presenteeism or absenteeism than in the general working population. There was high heterogeneity in outcome measures, especially for work productivity; this should be a focus of attention in future studies.

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000123

DO - 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000123

M3 - Article

C2 - 36812547

SN - 2767-3170

VL - 1

JO - PLOS Digital Health

JF - PLOS Digital Health

IS - 10

M1 - e0000123

ER -