By the same authors

From the same journal

Effectiveness-implementation of COPD case finding and self-management action plans in low- and middle-income countries: global excellence in COPD outcomes (GECo) study protocol

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Full text download(s)

Author(s)

  • Trishul Siddharthan
  • Suzanne L. Pollard
  • Shumonta A. Quaderi
  • Andrew Mirelman
  • Maria Kathia Cardenas
  • Bruce Kirenga
  • Natalie A. Rykiel
  • J Jaime Miranda
  • Laxman Shrestha
  • Ram K. Chandyo
  • Adithya Cattamanchi
  • Susan Michie
  • Julie Barber
  • William Checkley
  • John R Hurst

Department/unit(s)

Publication details

JournalTrials
DatePublished - 19 Oct 2018
Issue number571
Volume19
Number of pages15
Pages (from-to)1-15
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the end result of a susceptible individual being exposed to sufficiently deleterious environmental stimuli. More than 90% of COPD-related deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). LMICs face unique challenges in managing COPD; for example, deficient primary care systems present challenges for proper diagnosis and management. Formal diagnosis of COPD requires quality assured spirometry, which is often limited to urban health centres. Similarly, standard treatment options for COPD remain limited where few providers are trained to manage COPD. The Global Excellence in COPD Outcomes (GECo) studies aim to assess the performance of a COPD case-finding questionnaire with and without peak expiratory flow (PEF) to diagnose COPD, and inform the effectiveness and implementation of COPD self-management Action Plans in LMIC settings. The ultimate goal is to develop simple, low-cost models of care that can be implemented in LMICs. This study will be carried out in Nepal, Peru and Uganda, three distinct LMIC settings. Methods/design: We aim to assess the diagnostic accuracy of a simple questionnaire with and without PEF to case-find COPD (GECo1), and examine the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and implementation of a communityhealth-worker-supported self-management Action Plan strategy for managing exacerbations of COPD (GECo2). To achieve the first aim, we will enrol a randomly selected sample of up to 10,500 adults aged ≥ 40 years across our three sites, with the goal to enrol 240 participants with moderate-to-severe COPD in to GECo2. We will apply two case-finding questionnaires (Lung Function Questionnaire and CAPTURE) with and without PEF and compare performance against spirometry. We will report ROC areas, sensitivity and specificity. Individuals who are identified as having COPD grades B–D will be invited to enrol in an effectiveness-implementation hybrid randomised trial of a multi-faceted COPD self-management Action Plan intervention delivered by CHWs. The intervention group will receive (1) COPD education, (2) facilitated-self management Action Plans for COPD exacerbations and (3) monthly
visits by community health workers. The control group will receive COPD education and standard of care treatment provided by local health providers. Beginning at baseline, we will measure quality of life with the EuroQol-5D (EQ5D)
and St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) every 3 months over a period of 1 year. The primary endpoint is SGRQ at 12 months. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) using the Short-Form 36 version 2 will also be calculated. We will additionally assess the acceptability and feasibility of implementing COPD Action Plans in each setting among providers and individuals with COPD. Discussion: This study should provide evidence to inform the use of pragmatic models of COPD diagnosis and management in LMIC settings.

Bibliographical note

© The Author(s). 2018.

    Research areas

  • COPD, LMIC, NCD, Non-communicable diseases, TRIAL, COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations