By the same authors

From the same journal

From the same journal

Electronic prompts significantly increase response rates to postal questionnaires: a randomized trial within a randomized trial and meta-analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Published copy (DOI)

Author(s)

Department/unit(s)

Publication details

JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
DateE-pub ahead of print - 27 Jan 2015
DatePublished (current) - Dec 2015
Issue number12
Volume68
Number of pages5
Pages (from-to)1446-1450
Early online date27/01/15
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of sending electronic prompts to randomized controlled trial participants to return study questionnaires.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A "trial within a trial" embedded within a study determining the effectiveness of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (DOC) screening on smoking cessation. Those participants taking part in DOC who provided a mobile phone number and/or an electronic mail address were randomized to either receive an electronic prompt or no electronic prompt to return a study questionnaire. The results were combined with two previous studies in a meta-analysis.

RESULTS: A total of 437 participants were randomized: 226 to the electronic prompt group and 211 to the control group. A total of 285 (65.2%) participants returned the follow-up questionnaire: 157 (69.5%) in the electronic prompt group and 128 (60.7%) in the control group [difference 8.8%; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.11%, 17.7%; P = 0.05]. The mean time to response was 23 days in the electronic prompt group and 33 days in the control group (hazard ratio = 1.27; 95% CI: 1.105, 1.47). The meta-analysis of all three studies showed an increase in response rate of 7.1% (95% CI: 0.8%, 13.3%).

CONCLUSION: The use of electronic prompts increased response rates and reduces the time to response.

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations