By the same authors

From the same journal

Enabling Adaptation? Lessons from the new 'Green Revolution' in Malawi and Kenya

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

Enabling Adaptation? Lessons from the new 'Green Revolution' in Malawi and Kenya. / Brooks, Sally.

In: Climatic change, Vol. 122, No. 1-2, 01.2014, p. 15-26.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Brooks, S 2014, 'Enabling Adaptation? Lessons from the new 'Green Revolution' in Malawi and Kenya', Climatic change, vol. 122, no. 1-2, pp. 15-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0992-0

APA

Brooks, S. (2014). Enabling Adaptation? Lessons from the new 'Green Revolution' in Malawi and Kenya. Climatic change, 122(1-2), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0992-0

Vancouver

Brooks S. Enabling Adaptation? Lessons from the new 'Green Revolution' in Malawi and Kenya. Climatic change. 2014 Jan;122(1-2):15-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0992-0

Author

Brooks, Sally. / Enabling Adaptation? Lessons from the new 'Green Revolution' in Malawi and Kenya. In: Climatic change. 2014 ; Vol. 122, No. 1-2. pp. 15-26.

Bibtex - Download

@article{af46cce36aad42f29c3d1ef8cf036235,
title = "Enabling Adaptation?: Lessons from the new 'Green Revolution' in Malawi and Kenya",
abstract = "This article explores the extent to which efforts to improve productivity of smallholder agriculture through a new {\textquoteleft}Green Revolution{\textquoteright} in Sub Saharan Africa are likely to enhance the capacity of smallholder farmers to adapt to the impacts of climate change. Drawing on empirical material from Malawi and Kenya, the paper finds more conflicts than synergies between the pursuit of higher productivity through the promotion of hybrid maize adoption and crop diversification as a strategy for climate change adaptation. This is despite an oft-assumed causal link between escape from the {\textquoteleft}low maize productivity trap{\textquoteright} and progression towards crop diversification as an adaptive strategy. In both countries, a convergence of interests between governments, donors and seed companies, combined with a historical preference for, and dependence on maize as the primary staple, has led to a narrowing of options for smallholder farmers, undermining the development of adaptive capacities in the longer term. This dynamic is linked to the conflation of market-based variety of agricultural technologies, as viewed {\textquoteleft}from the top down{\textquoteright}, with diversity-in-context, as represented by site-specific and locally derived and adapted technologies and institutions that can only be developed {\textquoteleft}from the bottom up{\textquoteright}.",
author = "Sally Brooks",
year = "2014",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1007/s10584-013-0992-0",
language = "English",
volume = "122",
pages = "15--26",
journal = "Climatic change",
issn = "0165-0009",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1-2",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Enabling Adaptation?

T2 - Lessons from the new 'Green Revolution' in Malawi and Kenya

AU - Brooks, Sally

PY - 2014/1

Y1 - 2014/1

N2 - This article explores the extent to which efforts to improve productivity of smallholder agriculture through a new ‘Green Revolution’ in Sub Saharan Africa are likely to enhance the capacity of smallholder farmers to adapt to the impacts of climate change. Drawing on empirical material from Malawi and Kenya, the paper finds more conflicts than synergies between the pursuit of higher productivity through the promotion of hybrid maize adoption and crop diversification as a strategy for climate change adaptation. This is despite an oft-assumed causal link between escape from the ‘low maize productivity trap’ and progression towards crop diversification as an adaptive strategy. In both countries, a convergence of interests between governments, donors and seed companies, combined with a historical preference for, and dependence on maize as the primary staple, has led to a narrowing of options for smallholder farmers, undermining the development of adaptive capacities in the longer term. This dynamic is linked to the conflation of market-based variety of agricultural technologies, as viewed ‘from the top down’, with diversity-in-context, as represented by site-specific and locally derived and adapted technologies and institutions that can only be developed ‘from the bottom up’.

AB - This article explores the extent to which efforts to improve productivity of smallholder agriculture through a new ‘Green Revolution’ in Sub Saharan Africa are likely to enhance the capacity of smallholder farmers to adapt to the impacts of climate change. Drawing on empirical material from Malawi and Kenya, the paper finds more conflicts than synergies between the pursuit of higher productivity through the promotion of hybrid maize adoption and crop diversification as a strategy for climate change adaptation. This is despite an oft-assumed causal link between escape from the ‘low maize productivity trap’ and progression towards crop diversification as an adaptive strategy. In both countries, a convergence of interests between governments, donors and seed companies, combined with a historical preference for, and dependence on maize as the primary staple, has led to a narrowing of options for smallholder farmers, undermining the development of adaptive capacities in the longer term. This dynamic is linked to the conflation of market-based variety of agricultural technologies, as viewed ‘from the top down’, with diversity-in-context, as represented by site-specific and locally derived and adapted technologies and institutions that can only be developed ‘from the bottom up’.

U2 - 10.1007/s10584-013-0992-0

DO - 10.1007/s10584-013-0992-0

M3 - Article

VL - 122

SP - 15

EP - 26

JO - Climatic change

JF - Climatic change

SN - 0165-0009

IS - 1-2

ER -