Engaging Communities in the Big Society: What Impact is the Localism Agenda having on Community Archaeology

Stella Jackson; Rob Lennox; Cath Neal; Steve Roskams; John Hearle; Louise Brown

doi:10.1179/1756750513Z.00000000043

Engaging Communities in the Big Society: What Impact is the Localism Agenda having on Community Archaeology

Stella Jackson, Rob Lennox, Cath Neal, Steve Roskams, John Hearle, Louise Brown

Archaeology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

When the UK Coalition Government came to power in May 2010, its members brought with them a localism agenda, based upon what they called the ‘Big Society’. This agenda was focused on community engagement and devolvement of power, and has seen a number of legislative and policy changes in the UK, with the 2012 Localism Act devolving powers to local government, and providing means for local communities to become involved in decision making, inspire volunteerism, and support social enterprise. This paper draws upon debates which have arisen within the archaeological sector relating to the broad influence of the localism agenda on its work, with individual contributors taking various positions regarding theoretical analysis of the Big Society in relation to the social goals of archaeology. The contributors ask, respectively: what is it that we do which can be thought of as the Big Society, and what is its meaning against the context of the socially focused archaeology work already done by the sector? What limitations must we be aware of, and how can we make the most of the opportunities? Critical consideration is then given to why archaeologists should be interested in political agendas such as this.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	74-88
Number of pages	15
Journal	The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice
Volume	5
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1179/1756750513Z.00000000043
Publication status	Published - Mar 2014

Keywords

Big Society
Community archaeology
Government
Localism
Political agendas

Access to Document

10.1179/1756750513Z.00000000043

Cite this

@article{a06d702724294fbe868e257efe9b69fd,

title = "Engaging Communities in the Big Society: What Impact is the Localism Agenda having on Community Archaeology",

abstract = "When the UK Coalition Government came to power in May 2010, its members brought with them a localism agenda, based upon what they called the {\textquoteleft}Big Society{\textquoteright}. This agenda was focused on community engagement and devolvement of power, and has seen a number of legislative and policy changes in the UK, with the 2012 Localism Act devolving powers to local government, and providing means for local communities to become involved in decision making, inspire volunteerism, and support social enterprise. This paper draws upon debates which have arisen within the archaeological sector relating to the broad influence of the localism agenda on its work, with individual contributors taking various positions regarding theoretical analysis of the Big Society in relation to the social goals of archaeology. The contributors ask, respectively: what is it that we do which can be thought of as the Big Society, and what is its meaning against the context of the socially focused archaeology work already done by the sector? What limitations must we be aware of, and how can we make the most of the opportunities? Critical consideration is then given to why archaeologists should be interested in political agendas such as this.",

keywords = "Big Society, Community archaeology, Government, Localism, Political agendas",

author = "Stella Jackson and Rob Lennox and Cath Neal and Steve Roskams and John Hearle and Louise Brown",

year = "2014",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1179/1756750513Z.00000000043",

language = "English",

volume = "5",

pages = "74--88",

journal = "The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice",

issn = "1756-7505",

publisher = "Maney Publishing",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Engaging Communities in the Big Society

T2 - What Impact is the Localism Agenda having on Community Archaeology

AU - Jackson, Stella

AU - Lennox, Rob

AU - Neal, Cath

AU - Roskams, Steve

AU - Hearle, John

AU - Brown, Louise

PY - 2014/3

Y1 - 2014/3

N2 - When the UK Coalition Government came to power in May 2010, its members brought with them a localism agenda, based upon what they called the ‘Big Society’. This agenda was focused on community engagement and devolvement of power, and has seen a number of legislative and policy changes in the UK, with the 2012 Localism Act devolving powers to local government, and providing means for local communities to become involved in decision making, inspire volunteerism, and support social enterprise. This paper draws upon debates which have arisen within the archaeological sector relating to the broad influence of the localism agenda on its work, with individual contributors taking various positions regarding theoretical analysis of the Big Society in relation to the social goals of archaeology. The contributors ask, respectively: what is it that we do which can be thought of as the Big Society, and what is its meaning against the context of the socially focused archaeology work already done by the sector? What limitations must we be aware of, and how can we make the most of the opportunities? Critical consideration is then given to why archaeologists should be interested in political agendas such as this.

AB - When the UK Coalition Government came to power in May 2010, its members brought with them a localism agenda, based upon what they called the ‘Big Society’. This agenda was focused on community engagement and devolvement of power, and has seen a number of legislative and policy changes in the UK, with the 2012 Localism Act devolving powers to local government, and providing means for local communities to become involved in decision making, inspire volunteerism, and support social enterprise. This paper draws upon debates which have arisen within the archaeological sector relating to the broad influence of the localism agenda on its work, with individual contributors taking various positions regarding theoretical analysis of the Big Society in relation to the social goals of archaeology. The contributors ask, respectively: what is it that we do which can be thought of as the Big Society, and what is its meaning against the context of the socially focused archaeology work already done by the sector? What limitations must we be aware of, and how can we make the most of the opportunities? Critical consideration is then given to why archaeologists should be interested in political agendas such as this.

KW - Big Society

KW - Community archaeology

KW - Government

KW - Localism

KW - Political agendas

U2 - 10.1179/1756750513Z.00000000043

DO - 10.1179/1756750513Z.00000000043

M3 - Article

SN - 1756-7505

VL - 5

SP - 74

EP - 88

JO - The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice

JF - The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice

IS - 1

ER -