Evaluation of dissolved organic carbon as a soil quality indicator in national monitoring schemes

David L. Jones; Paul Simfukwe; Paul W. Hill; Robert T.E. Mills; Bridget A. Emmett

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0090882

Evaluation of dissolved organic carbon as a soil quality indicator in national monitoring schemes

David L. Jones, Paul Simfukwe, Paul W. Hill, Robert T.E. Mills, Bridget A. Emmett

Environment and Geography

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Background: Monitoring the properties of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in soil water is frequently used to evaluate changes in soil quality and to explain shifts in freshwater ecosystem functioning. Methods: Using >700 individual soils (0-15 cm) collected from a 209,331 km² area we evaluated the relationship between soil classification (7 major soil types) or vegetation cover (8 dominant classes, e.g. cropland, grassland, forest) and the absorbance properties (254 and 400 nm), DOC quantity and quality (SUVA, total soluble phenolics) of soil water. Results: Overall, a good correlation (r² = 0.58) was apparent between soil water absorbance and DOC concentration across the diverse range of soil types tested. In contrast, both DOC and the absorbance properties of soil water provided a poor predictor of SUVA or soluble phenolics which we used as a measure of humic substance concentration. Significant overlap in the measured ranges for UV absorbance, DOC, phenolic content and especially SUVA of soil water were apparent between the 8 vegetation and 7 soil classes. A number of significant differences, however, were apparent within these populations with total soluble phenolics giving the greatest statistical separation between both soil and vegetation groups. Conclusions: We conclude that the quality of DOC rather than its quantity provides a more useful measure of soil quality in large scale surveys.

Original language	English
Article number	e90882
Number of pages	6
Journal	PLoS ONE
Volume	9
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090882
Publication status	Published - 14 Mar 2014

Access to Document

10.1371/journal.pone.0090882

Cite this

@article{37743185ab7a462893817fe30a6697a3,

title = "Evaluation of dissolved organic carbon as a soil quality indicator in national monitoring schemes",

abstract = "Background: Monitoring the properties of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in soil water is frequently used to evaluate changes in soil quality and to explain shifts in freshwater ecosystem functioning. Methods: Using >700 individual soils (0-15 cm) collected from a 209,331 km2 area we evaluated the relationship between soil classification (7 major soil types) or vegetation cover (8 dominant classes, e.g. cropland, grassland, forest) and the absorbance properties (254 and 400 nm), DOC quantity and quality (SUVA, total soluble phenolics) of soil water. Results: Overall, a good correlation (r2 = 0.58) was apparent between soil water absorbance and DOC concentration across the diverse range of soil types tested. In contrast, both DOC and the absorbance properties of soil water provided a poor predictor of SUVA or soluble phenolics which we used as a measure of humic substance concentration. Significant overlap in the measured ranges for UV absorbance, DOC, phenolic content and especially SUVA of soil water were apparent between the 8 vegetation and 7 soil classes. A number of significant differences, however, were apparent within these populations with total soluble phenolics giving the greatest statistical separation between both soil and vegetation groups. Conclusions: We conclude that the quality of DOC rather than its quantity provides a more useful measure of soil quality in large scale surveys.",

author = "Jones, {David L.} and Paul Simfukwe and Hill, {Paul W.} and Mills, {Robert T.E.} and Emmett, {Bridget A.}",

year = "2014",

month = mar,

day = "14",

doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0090882",

language = "English",

volume = "9",

journal = "PLoS ONE",

issn = "1932-6203",

publisher = "Public Library of Science",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of dissolved organic carbon as a soil quality indicator in national monitoring schemes

AU - Jones, David L.

AU - Simfukwe, Paul

AU - Hill, Paul W.

AU - Mills, Robert T.E.

AU - Emmett, Bridget A.

PY - 2014/3/14

Y1 - 2014/3/14

N2 - Background: Monitoring the properties of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in soil water is frequently used to evaluate changes in soil quality and to explain shifts in freshwater ecosystem functioning. Methods: Using >700 individual soils (0-15 cm) collected from a 209,331 km2 area we evaluated the relationship between soil classification (7 major soil types) or vegetation cover (8 dominant classes, e.g. cropland, grassland, forest) and the absorbance properties (254 and 400 nm), DOC quantity and quality (SUVA, total soluble phenolics) of soil water. Results: Overall, a good correlation (r2 = 0.58) was apparent between soil water absorbance and DOC concentration across the diverse range of soil types tested. In contrast, both DOC and the absorbance properties of soil water provided a poor predictor of SUVA or soluble phenolics which we used as a measure of humic substance concentration. Significant overlap in the measured ranges for UV absorbance, DOC, phenolic content and especially SUVA of soil water were apparent between the 8 vegetation and 7 soil classes. A number of significant differences, however, were apparent within these populations with total soluble phenolics giving the greatest statistical separation between both soil and vegetation groups. Conclusions: We conclude that the quality of DOC rather than its quantity provides a more useful measure of soil quality in large scale surveys.

AB - Background: Monitoring the properties of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in soil water is frequently used to evaluate changes in soil quality and to explain shifts in freshwater ecosystem functioning. Methods: Using >700 individual soils (0-15 cm) collected from a 209,331 km2 area we evaluated the relationship between soil classification (7 major soil types) or vegetation cover (8 dominant classes, e.g. cropland, grassland, forest) and the absorbance properties (254 and 400 nm), DOC quantity and quality (SUVA, total soluble phenolics) of soil water. Results: Overall, a good correlation (r2 = 0.58) was apparent between soil water absorbance and DOC concentration across the diverse range of soil types tested. In contrast, both DOC and the absorbance properties of soil water provided a poor predictor of SUVA or soluble phenolics which we used as a measure of humic substance concentration. Significant overlap in the measured ranges for UV absorbance, DOC, phenolic content and especially SUVA of soil water were apparent between the 8 vegetation and 7 soil classes. A number of significant differences, however, were apparent within these populations with total soluble phenolics giving the greatest statistical separation between both soil and vegetation groups. Conclusions: We conclude that the quality of DOC rather than its quantity provides a more useful measure of soil quality in large scale surveys.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898475520&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0090882

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0090882

M3 - Article

C2 - 24633085

AN - SCOPUS:84898475520

VL - 9

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 3

M1 - e90882

ER -

Evaluation of dissolved organic carbon as a soil quality indicator in national monitoring schemes

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this