By the same authors

From the same journal

From the same journal

External validation of clinical prediction models: simulation-based sample size calculations were more reliable than rules-of-thumb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Published copy (DOI)


  • Kym Ie Snell
  • Lucinda Archer
  • Joie Ensor
  • Laura J Bonnett
  • Thomas Pa Debray
  • Bob Phillips
  • Gary S Collins
  • Richard D Riley


Publication details

JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
DateAccepted/In press - 14 Feb 2021
DateE-pub ahead of print (current) - 14 Feb 2021
Early online date14/02/21
Original languageEnglish


INTRODUCTION: Sample size 'rules-of-thumb' for external validation of clinical prediction models suggest at least 100 events and 100 non-events. Such blanket guidance is imprecise, and not specific to the model or validation setting. We investigate factors affecting precision of model performance estimates upon external validation, and propose a more tailored sample size approach.

METHODS: Simulation of logistic regression prediction models to investigate factors associated with precision of performance estimates. Then, explanation and illustration of a simulation-based approach to calculate the minimum sample size required to precisely estimate a model's calibration, discrimination and clinical utility.

RESULTS: Precision is affected by the model's linear predictor (LP) distribution, in addition to number of events and total sample size. Sample sizes of 100 (or even 200) events and non-events can give imprecise estimates, especially for calibration. The simulation-based calculation accounts for the LP distribution and (mis)calibration in the validation sample. Application identifies 2430 required participants (531 events) for external validation of a deep vein thrombosis diagnostic model.

CONCLUSION: Where researchers can anticipate the distribution of the model's LP (e.g. based on development sample, or a pilot study), a simulation-based approach for calculating sample size for external validation offers more flexibility and reliability than rules-of-thumb.

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations