Facts and findings: A reply to Powell and Nettelbeck (2014)

Sophie von Stumm; Benedikt Hell; Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic

doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.015

Facts and findings: A reply to Powell and Nettelbeck (2014)

Sophie von Stumm^*, Benedikt Hell, Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic

^*Corresponding author for this work

Education

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

In their recent article Powell and Nettelbeck (2014) question the predictive validity of intellectual curiosity for academic performance. We discuss here three issues we found with their report.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	252-253
Number of pages	2
Journal	Personality and Individual Differences
Volume	70
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.015
Publication status	Published - 1 Nov 2014

Keywords

Academic performance
Intellectual curiosity
Replication
Research critique

Access to Document

10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.015

Cite this

@article{ce99b220baae4cadaf2aea300c45322f,

title = "Facts and findings: A reply to Powell and Nettelbeck (2014)",

abstract = "In their recent article Powell and Nettelbeck (2014) question the predictive validity of intellectual curiosity for academic performance. We discuss here three issues we found with their report.",

keywords = "Academic performance, Intellectual curiosity, Replication, Research critique",

author = "{von Stumm}, Sophie and Benedikt Hell and Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic",

year = "2014",

month = nov,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.015",

language = "English",

volume = "70",

pages = "252--253",

journal = "Personality and Individual Differences",

issn = "0191-8869",

publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Facts and findings

T2 - A reply to Powell and Nettelbeck (2014)

AU - von Stumm, Sophie

AU - Hell, Benedikt

AU - Chamorro-Premuzic, Tomas

PY - 2014/11/1

Y1 - 2014/11/1

N2 - In their recent article Powell and Nettelbeck (2014) question the predictive validity of intellectual curiosity for academic performance. We discuss here three issues we found with their report.

AB - In their recent article Powell and Nettelbeck (2014) question the predictive validity of intellectual curiosity for academic performance. We discuss here three issues we found with their report.

KW - Academic performance

KW - Intellectual curiosity

KW - Replication

KW - Research critique

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907445511&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.015

DO - 10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.015

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84907445511

SN - 0191-8869

VL - 70

SP - 252

EP - 253

JO - Personality and Individual Differences

JF - Personality and Individual Differences

ER -

Facts and findings: A reply to Powell and Nettelbeck (2014)

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this