Facts and findings: A reply to Powell and Nettelbeck (2014)

Sophie von Stumm*, Benedikt Hell, Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


In their recent article Powell and Nettelbeck (2014) question the predictive validity of intellectual curiosity for academic performance. We discuss here three issues we found with their report.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)252-253
Number of pages2
JournalPersonality and Individual Differences
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2014


  • Academic performance
  • Intellectual curiosity
  • Replication
  • Research critique

Cite this