For a (revised) PCA-Analysis

Paul Jonathan Pitt Noordhof; Jonardon Ganeri; Murali Ramachandran

For a (revised) PCA-Analysis

Paul Jonathan Pitt Noordhof, Jonardon Ganeri, Murali Ramachandran

Philosophy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

We respond to criticisms made by Byrne and Hall ('Analysis', same issue), of our earlier theory ('Analysis', 56, 1996) of causation, a counterfactual analysis based on the notion of a "potentially complete ancestor" to a causal event.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	45-47
Number of pages	2
Journal	Analysis
Volume	58
Publication status	Published - Jan 1998

Cite this

@article{49fce0d4b8d6484fadddb208de2e4432,

title = "For a (revised) PCA-Analysis",

abstract = "We respond to criticisms made by Byrne and Hall ('Analysis', same issue), of our earlier theory ('Analysis', 56, 1996) of causation, a counterfactual analysis based on the notion of a {"}potentially complete ancestor{"} to a causal event.",

author = "Noordhof, {Paul Jonathan Pitt} and Jonardon Ganeri and Murali Ramachandran",

year = "1998",

month = jan,

language = "English",

volume = "58",

pages = "45--47",

journal = "Analysis",

issn = "0003-2638",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - For a (revised) PCA-Analysis

AU - Noordhof, Paul Jonathan Pitt

AU - Ganeri, Jonardon

AU - Ramachandran, Murali

PY - 1998/1

Y1 - 1998/1

N2 - We respond to criticisms made by Byrne and Hall ('Analysis', same issue), of our earlier theory ('Analysis', 56, 1996) of causation, a counterfactual analysis based on the notion of a "potentially complete ancestor" to a causal event.

AB - We respond to criticisms made by Byrne and Hall ('Analysis', same issue), of our earlier theory ('Analysis', 56, 1996) of causation, a counterfactual analysis based on the notion of a "potentially complete ancestor" to a causal event.

M3 - Article

SN - 0003-2638

VL - 58

SP - 45

EP - 47

JO - Analysis

JF - Analysis

ER -