Journal | Enterprise & society |
---|
Date | Accepted/In press - 2 Aug 2018 |
---|
Date | E-pub ahead of print - 18 Feb 2019 |
---|
Date | Published (current) - 1 Jun 2019 |
---|
Issue number | 2 |
---|
Volume | 20 |
---|
Number of pages | 35 |
---|
Pages (from-to) | 366-400 |
---|
Early online date | 18/02/19 |
---|
Original language | English |
---|
Founded in 1956, the Administrative Staff College of India (ASCI) was established with the objective of professionalizing management in post-colonial India through training, research, and consultancy. It was modelled on the Administrative Staff College at Henley-on-Thames (henceforth Henley), UK. Like Henley, ASCI used syndicates for its management training programmes. Between 1958-73, ASCI received $1,266,143 from the Ford Foundation (FF), part of which was used to finance the development and use of the case-method in ASCI’s training programmes and later, more widely in its research and consultancy. This article traces the ways by which FF––as a “dominating institution”––engaged in the stigmatization of both Henley and ASCI, their institutional practices as well as the wider Indian society; while legitimating the case-method, pioneered at the Harvard Business School (HBS). Imbricated in the Cold War geo-politics, FF’s interventions in Hyderabad, the article argues, should be understood as part of USA’s emergence as the dominant neo-colonial power, which required the displacement of Britain, its institutions, and their practices as the template for India’s post-colonial management institutions.
This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details.