Furthering the language hypothesis of alexithymia: An integrated review and meta-analysis

Ka Shu Lee; Jennifer Murphy; Caroline Catmur; Geoffrey Bird; Hannah Hobson

doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104864

Furthering the language hypothesis of alexithymia: An integrated review and meta-analysis

Ka Shu Lee^*, Jennifer Murphy, Caroline Catmur, Geoffrey Bird, Hannah Hobson

^*Corresponding author for this work

Psychology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Alexithymia, including the inability to identify and express one’s own feelings, is a subclinical condition responsible for some of the socioemotional symptoms seen across a range of psychiatric conditions. The language hypothesis of alexithymia posits a language-mediated disruption in the development of discrete emotion concepts from ambiguous affective states, exacerbating the risk of developing alexithymia in language-impaired individuals. To provide a critical evaluation, a systematic review and meta-analysis of 29 empirical studies of language functioning in alexithymia was performed. A modest association was found between alexithymia and multi-domain language deficits (r = -0.14), including structural language, pragmatics, and propensity to use emotional language. A more theoretically-relevant subsample analysis comparing alexithymia levels in language-impaired and typical individuals revealed larger effects, but a limited number of studies adopted this approach. A synthesis of 11 emotional granularity studies also found an association between alexithymia and reduced emotional granularity (r = -0.10). Language impairments seem to increase the risk of alexithymia. Heterogeneous samples and methods suggest the need for studies with improved alexithymia assessments

Original language	English
Article number	104864
Number of pages	23
Journal	Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
Volume	141
Early online date	14 Sept 2022
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104864
Publication status	Published - Oct 2022

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104864Licence: CC BY-NC-ND

1-s2.0-S0149763422003530-main
© 2022 The Author(s)
Final published version, 6.69 MBLicence: CC BY-NC-ND

Cite this

@article{a791eaba1d2247c8b52923fa283f7f88,

title = "Furthering the language hypothesis of alexithymia: An integrated review and meta-analysis",

abstract = "Alexithymia, including the inability to identify and express one{\textquoteright}s own feelings, is a subclinical condition responsible for some of the socioemotional symptoms seen across a range of psychiatric conditions. The language hypothesis of alexithymia posits a language-mediated disruption in the development of discrete emotion concepts from ambiguous affective states, exacerbating the risk of developing alexithymia in language-impaired individuals. To provide a critical evaluation, a systematic review and meta-analysis of 29 empirical studies of language functioning in alexithymia was performed. A modest association was found between alexithymia and multi-domain language deficits (r = -0.14), including structural language, pragmatics, and propensity to use emotional language. A more theoretically-relevant subsample analysis comparing alexithymia levels in language-impaired and typical individuals revealed larger effects, but a limited number of studies adopted this approach. A synthesis of 11 emotional granularity studies also found an association between alexithymia and reduced emotional granularity (r = -0.10). Language impairments seem to increase the risk of alexithymia. Heterogeneous samples and methods suggest the need for studies with improved alexithymia assessments",

author = "Lee, {Ka Shu} and Jennifer Murphy and Caroline Catmur and Geoffrey Bird and Hannah Hobson",

note = "{\textcopyright} 2022 The Author(s)",

year = "2022",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104864",

language = "English",

volume = "141",

journal = "Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews",

issn = "0149-7634",

publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Furthering the language hypothesis of alexithymia: An integrated review and meta-analysis

AU - Lee, Ka Shu

AU - Murphy, Jennifer

AU - Catmur, Caroline

AU - Bird, Geoffrey

AU - Hobson, Hannah

PY - 2022/10

Y1 - 2022/10

N2 - Alexithymia, including the inability to identify and express one’s own feelings, is a subclinical condition responsible for some of the socioemotional symptoms seen across a range of psychiatric conditions. The language hypothesis of alexithymia posits a language-mediated disruption in the development of discrete emotion concepts from ambiguous affective states, exacerbating the risk of developing alexithymia in language-impaired individuals. To provide a critical evaluation, a systematic review and meta-analysis of 29 empirical studies of language functioning in alexithymia was performed. A modest association was found between alexithymia and multi-domain language deficits (r = -0.14), including structural language, pragmatics, and propensity to use emotional language. A more theoretically-relevant subsample analysis comparing alexithymia levels in language-impaired and typical individuals revealed larger effects, but a limited number of studies adopted this approach. A synthesis of 11 emotional granularity studies also found an association between alexithymia and reduced emotional granularity (r = -0.10). Language impairments seem to increase the risk of alexithymia. Heterogeneous samples and methods suggest the need for studies with improved alexithymia assessments

AB - Alexithymia, including the inability to identify and express one’s own feelings, is a subclinical condition responsible for some of the socioemotional symptoms seen across a range of psychiatric conditions. The language hypothesis of alexithymia posits a language-mediated disruption in the development of discrete emotion concepts from ambiguous affective states, exacerbating the risk of developing alexithymia in language-impaired individuals. To provide a critical evaluation, a systematic review and meta-analysis of 29 empirical studies of language functioning in alexithymia was performed. A modest association was found between alexithymia and multi-domain language deficits (r = -0.14), including structural language, pragmatics, and propensity to use emotional language. A more theoretically-relevant subsample analysis comparing alexithymia levels in language-impaired and typical individuals revealed larger effects, but a limited number of studies adopted this approach. A synthesis of 11 emotional granularity studies also found an association between alexithymia and reduced emotional granularity (r = -0.10). Language impairments seem to increase the risk of alexithymia. Heterogeneous samples and methods suggest the need for studies with improved alexithymia assessments

U2 - 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104864

DO - 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104864

M3 - Article

SN - 0149-7634

VL - 141

JO - Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews

JF - Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews

M1 - 104864

ER -