Abstract
Prosody has been shown to successfully disambiguate a selected number of
garden-path sentences (see e.g. Kjelgaard & Speer 1999; Grillo et al. 2018 and
Wagner & Watson 2010 for review). We extend this work by showing that: -
Speakers prosodically disambiguate Complement Clauses (CCs: John [told [the
woman] [that he was running with Bill]]) and Relative Clauses (RCs: John [told
[the woman [that he was running with] [to wait]]). -Moreover, listeners are
sensitive to this prosodic disambiguation and can use it to avoid garden-path
effects. EXP1: A Planned Production (N=10 English speakers), 24 target
sentences shows that speakers make use of both temporal and tonal cues to
disambiguate the two readings. EXP2: In a Forced-Choice Comprehension task,
60 participants heard sentence fragments up to (but not including) the
disambiguating region of ambiguous CC/RC (e.g. John told the woman that he
was running with…) and selected between CC (Bill) and RC (to wait)
continuations. Sentences contained prosodic disambiguation consistent with
EXP1. Results: Main effect of Prosody (p<.0001). % of RC-choices RC-Prosody:
57.9% CC-Prosody: 25.5% Post-hoc analysis removing 8 outlier participants
(who always only selected the CC continuation) showed the prosodically
targeted structure being selected equivalently (70%) across conditions.
garden-path sentences (see e.g. Kjelgaard & Speer 1999; Grillo et al. 2018 and
Wagner & Watson 2010 for review). We extend this work by showing that: -
Speakers prosodically disambiguate Complement Clauses (CCs: John [told [the
woman] [that he was running with Bill]]) and Relative Clauses (RCs: John [told
[the woman [that he was running with] [to wait]]). -Moreover, listeners are
sensitive to this prosodic disambiguation and can use it to avoid garden-path
effects. EXP1: A Planned Production (N=10 English speakers), 24 target
sentences shows that speakers make use of both temporal and tonal cues to
disambiguate the two readings. EXP2: In a Forced-Choice Comprehension task,
60 participants heard sentence fragments up to (but not including) the
disambiguating region of ambiguous CC/RC (e.g. John told the woman that he
was running with…) and selected between CC (Bill) and RC (to wait)
continuations. Sentences contained prosodic disambiguation consistent with
EXP1. Results: Main effect of Prosody (p<.0001). % of RC-choices RC-Prosody:
57.9% CC-Prosody: 25.5% Post-hoc analysis removing 8 outlier participants
(who always only selected the CC continuation) showed the prosodically
targeted structure being selected equivalently (70%) across conditions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages | 173 |
Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2023 |
Event | Architectures and Mechanisms of Language Processing 2023 - BCBL - Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language, San Sebastian/Donostia, Spain Duration: 31 Aug 2023 → 2 Sept 2023 https://www.bcbl.eu/events/amlap/en/ |
Conference
Conference | Architectures and Mechanisms of Language Processing 2023 |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | AMLaP23 |
Country/Territory | Spain |
City | San Sebastian/Donostia |
Period | 31/08/23 → 2/09/23 |
Internet address |
Keywords
- Psycholinguistics
- Linguistics
- Sentence Processing
- Prosody