Gender equality in child support policy: Fathers’ rhetoric of ‘fairness’ in a parliamentary inquiry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Published copy (DOI)

Author(s)

Department/unit(s)

Publication details

JournalSocial Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society
DateAccepted/In press - 11 Mar 2018
DateE-pub ahead of print - 8 May 2018
DatePublished (current) - Mar 2019
Issue number1
Volume26
Pages (from-to)164-187
Early online date8/05/18
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Child support payments extend separated fathers’ male breadwinning role across households, likely fuelling fathers’ perceptions of ‘unfairness’. By examining fathers’ written submissions to an Australian inquiry, we examine fathers’ claims of unfairness, which were expressed in terms of gender inequality. Here, we show how fathers adopted a gender equality discourse that left intact the existing gender order. Through expectations for equal treatment, men claimed the child support system would produce equality of outcomes, namely eliminating the redistributive need for child support payments. In doing so, fathers’ qualified support for gender equality advantaged men as payers while further entrenching gender inequity.

Bibliographical note

© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press. This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details.

    Research areas

  • child support; feminist policy analysis; gender equality; gender equity; male breadwinner model; separated fathers

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations