Gendering the Floating Voter: A Mixed Methods Study of Gender and Undecided Voters in Britain

Rosalind Shorrocks; Anna Leslie Sanders

doi:10.1177/13691481241240385

Gendering the Floating Voter: A Mixed Methods Study of Gender and Undecided Voters in Britain

Rosalind Shorrocks, Anna Leslie Sanders

Politics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Women are more undecided than men about their vote choice, with around 20-30% of female respondents giving a ‘don’t know’ response to vote intention survey questions in Britain. In this paper, we employ a mixed methods research design to explore why women are more likely to be undecided about their vote choice than men. Using survey data, we find that the gender gap in ‘don’t know’ responses is associated with gender gaps in political engagement and perceptions of policy representation. In focus groups, we find differences between men and women in how they want to be represented, and gender differences in conflict-avoidance/conflict-seeking, both of which we expect to contribute to gender differences in making a vote choice in-between elections. Our findings contribute to our understanding of how men and women engage with politics in Britain, as well as having implications for interpreting gender differences in vote intention in surveys.

Original language	English
Journal	British Journal of Politics and International Relations
Early online date	19 Apr 2024
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/13691481241240385
Publication status	Published - 19 Apr 2024

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

10.1177/13691481241240385

Gendering the Floating Voter BJPIR accepted
© The Author(s) 2024
Accepted author manuscript, 159 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{c8a8ad94c17b48259cf8176f9f8e6377,

title = "Gendering the Floating Voter: A Mixed Methods Study of Gender and Undecided Voters in Britain",

abstract = "Women are more undecided than men about their vote choice, with around 20-30% of female respondents giving a {\textquoteleft}don{\textquoteright}t know{\textquoteright} response to vote intention survey questions in Britain. In this paper, we employ a mixed methods research design to explore why women are more likely to be undecided about their vote choice than men. Using survey data, we find that the gender gap in {\textquoteleft}don{\textquoteright}t know{\textquoteright} responses is associated with gender gaps in political engagement and perceptions of policy representation. In focus groups, we find differences between men and women in how they want to be represented, and gender differences in conflict-avoidance/conflict-seeking, both of which we expect to contribute to gender differences in making a vote choice in-between elections. Our findings contribute to our understanding of how men and women engage with politics in Britain, as well as having implications for interpreting gender differences in vote intention in surveys.",

author = "Rosalind Shorrocks and Sanders, {Anna Leslie}",

note = "{\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2024",

year = "2024",

month = apr,

day = "19",

doi = "10.1177/13691481241240385",

language = "English",

journal = "British Journal of Politics and International Relations",

issn = "1369-1481",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gendering the Floating Voter

T2 - A Mixed Methods Study of Gender and Undecided Voters in Britain

AU - Shorrocks, Rosalind

AU - Sanders, Anna Leslie

PY - 2024/4/19

Y1 - 2024/4/19

N2 - Women are more undecided than men about their vote choice, with around 20-30% of female respondents giving a ‘don’t know’ response to vote intention survey questions in Britain. In this paper, we employ a mixed methods research design to explore why women are more likely to be undecided about their vote choice than men. Using survey data, we find that the gender gap in ‘don’t know’ responses is associated with gender gaps in political engagement and perceptions of policy representation. In focus groups, we find differences between men and women in how they want to be represented, and gender differences in conflict-avoidance/conflict-seeking, both of which we expect to contribute to gender differences in making a vote choice in-between elections. Our findings contribute to our understanding of how men and women engage with politics in Britain, as well as having implications for interpreting gender differences in vote intention in surveys.

AB - Women are more undecided than men about their vote choice, with around 20-30% of female respondents giving a ‘don’t know’ response to vote intention survey questions in Britain. In this paper, we employ a mixed methods research design to explore why women are more likely to be undecided about their vote choice than men. Using survey data, we find that the gender gap in ‘don’t know’ responses is associated with gender gaps in political engagement and perceptions of policy representation. In focus groups, we find differences between men and women in how they want to be represented, and gender differences in conflict-avoidance/conflict-seeking, both of which we expect to contribute to gender differences in making a vote choice in-between elections. Our findings contribute to our understanding of how men and women engage with politics in Britain, as well as having implications for interpreting gender differences in vote intention in surveys.

U2 - 10.1177/13691481241240385

DO - 10.1177/13691481241240385

M3 - Article

SN - 1369-1481

JO - British Journal of Politics and International Relations

JF - British Journal of Politics and International Relations

ER -