Generalizing

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingEntry for encyclopedia/dictionary

Full text download(s)

Author(s)

Department/unit(s)

Publication details

Title of host publicationRoutledge Handbook of Interdisciplinary Methods
DateAccepted/In press - 2017
DateUnpublished (current) - 2017
PublisherRoutledge
EditorsCelia Lury, Patricia Clough, Una Chung, Rachel Fensham, Sybille Lammes, Angela Last, Mike Michael, Emma Uprichard
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Our aim in this short article is to open up issues around generalising in social science research. We counter-point a tendency to evidence explanatory hypotheses by way of adding up specific ‘confirmations’, with the radically different approach of arriving at understandings of ‘world-making’ through sustained contemplation of the lone instance. What we are putting into question is the modernist insistence on attaching a valuation of ‘one’ to any incident or event: to denote a particular instance as a ‘specific case’, a ‘single example’, a ‘one-off’. This is not just because the one-off can be dismissed as irrelevant, to be treated as either something of little or no account, or as the deviation that proves the rule. Rather, as ethnographers in different fields, we both cherish the value of the exemplar, the moment, incident or instance that sums up what is going on and which seems to throw everything else into light

    Research areas

  • generalising

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations