Guidance and conceptual tools to inform the design, selection and evaluation of research capacity strengthening interventions

Justin Pulford, Susie Crossman, Pierre Abomo, Jessica Amegee Quach, Sara Begg, Yan Ding, Taghreed El Hajj, Imelda Bates

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

This practice note presents four conceptual tools intended to support the design, selection and evaluation of research capacity strengthening (RCS) programmes in low-income and middle-income country settings. The tools may be used by a wide range of RCS stakeholders, including funders, implementing parties and programme evaluators, to guide decision-making in lieu of largely as yet unavailable empirical evidence. The first conceptual tool guides decision-making regarding RCS intervention design, focusing specifically on the combination and integration of potential intervention activities. The second conceptual tool provides a framework for assessing the implementation challenges of potential RCS interventions in terms of: (1) the overall cost of implementing the proposed intervention in a given context; (2) the length of time required to complete full implementation of the proposed intervention in a given context and (3) the level of control the implementing partners would have over the proposed intervention in a given context. The third conceptual tool provides a means to consider the anticipated impact of potential RCS interventions in order to inform selection decisions (ie, which out of a number of potential RCS intervention options may be most impactful in a given setting given the intervention design and implementation challenges). The fourth and final tool is designed to support the evaluation of a collective RCS effort, whether that be multiple RCS interventions delivered within the context of a single or continuous programme or multiple RCS programmes delivered in a common setting.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere005153
Number of pages5
JournalBMJ Global health
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Mar 2021

Bibliographical note

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021.

Cite this