Abstract
This article considers the customary choice of silence over voice of two groups of UK workers – women clergy and women actors – who routinely tolerate poor quality conditions rather than express dissatisfaction. We argue that a key mediating factor is an expanded version of Hirschman’s (1970) concept of loyalty. The article considers how occupational ideologies facilitate loyalty as adaptation to disadvantage in ways that discourage voice, in framing silence as positive. Consequently, we also identify this type of loyalty as potentially salient in understanding silence in other occupations. A descriptive model comparing strength of occupational ideology and voicing of dissatisfaction is outlined, and through discussion of findings the article offers conceptual refinements of loyalty in accounting for worker silence.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1237-1257 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | Human Relations |
Volume | 70 |
Issue number | 10 |
Early online date | 12 May 2017 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2017 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This research was supported by funds from: Leicester Business School, De Montfort University; Susanna Wesley Foundation, Roehampton University; and Warwick Business School, University of Warwick.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, © The Author(s) 2017.
Keywords
- calling
- clergy
- loyalty
- occupational ideologies
- voice
- women workers - actors