How does exposure to nitrogen dioxide compare between on-road and off-road cycle routes?

T. Bean, N. Carslaw, M. Ashmore, A. Gillah, C. Parkinson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study demonstrates a simple method to estimate the extent to which the exposure of cyclists to NO2 is reduced by using off-road cycle routes rather than on-road cycle routes. Diffusion tubes were used to measure monthly NO2 concentrations on three paired sets of on- and off-road cycle journeys in and around the City of York in August and September 2008. These measurements were combined with estimates of journey times to calculate time-weighted average concentration and exposure on each route. The average concentration of NO2 was significantly reduced by a mean of 37.5% when off-road routes were used in place of on-road routes and, despite the longer journey times for off-road routes, exposure was also significantly reduced by a mean of 25.5%. The method described in this study could be adopted more widely to provide a cost effective and simple means of assessing the benefits of alternative cycle routes that are provided by Local Authorities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1039-1045
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Environmental Monitoring
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2011

Keywords

  • AMBIENT AIR-POLLUTION
  • RESPIRATORY SYMPTOMS
  • COHORT
  • HEALTH

Cite this