By the same authors

From the same journal

From the same journal

How robust are neural network models of stimulus generalization?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Author(s)

Department/unit(s)

Publication details

JournalBiosystems
DatePublished - May 2008
Issue number2
Volume92
Number of pages7
Pages (from-to)175-181
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Artificial feed-forward neural networks are commonly used as a tool for modelling stimulus selection and animal signalling. A key finding of stimulus selection research has been generalization: if a given behaviour has been established to one stimulus, perceptually similar novel stimuli are likely to induce a similar response. Stimulus generalization, in feed-forward neural networks, automatically arises as a property of the network. This network property raises understandable concern regarding the sensitivity of the network to variation in its internal parameter values used in relation to its structure and to its training process. Researchers must have confidence that the predictions of their model follow from the underlying biology that they deliberately incorporated in the model, and not from often arbitrary choices about model implementation. We study how network training and parameter perturbations influence the qualitative and quantitative behaviour of a simple but general network. Specifically, for models of stimulus control we study the effect that parameter variation has on the shape of the generalization curves produced by the network. We show that certain network and training conditions produce undesirable artifacts that need to be avoided (or at least understood) when modelling stimulus selection. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

    Research areas

  • stimulus generalization, neural networks, stimulus control, stimulus selection, MIMICRY, SIGNALS

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations