If you’re a Rawlsian, how come you’re so close to utilitarianism and intuitionism? A critique of Daniels’s Accountability for Reasonableness

Gabriele Badano

doi:10.1007/s10728-017-0343-9

If you’re a Rawlsian, how come you’re so close to utilitarianism and intuitionism? A critique of Daniels’s Accountability for Reasonableness

Politics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	English
Number of pages	16
Journal	Health Care Analysis
Volume	26
Issue number	1
Early online date	22 Mar 2017
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-017-0343-9
Publication status	Published - Mar 2018

Bibliographical note

©The Author(s) 2017

Access to Document

10.1007/s10728-017-0343-9

Badano2018_Article_IfYouReARawlsianHowComeYouReSo
©The Author(s) 2017
Final published version, 261 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{1baf318ecd9d447eb3f6306deb259117,

title = "If you{\textquoteright}re a Rawlsian, how come you{\textquoteright}re so close to utilitarianism and intuitionism? A critique of Daniels{\textquoteright}s Accountability for Reasonableness",

author = "Gabriele Badano",

note = "{\textcopyright}The Author(s) 2017",

year = "2018",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1007/s10728-017-0343-9",

language = "English",

volume = "26",

journal = "Health Care Analysis",

issn = "1065-3058",

publisher = "Springer",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - If you’re a Rawlsian, how come you’re so close to utilitarianism and intuitionism? A critique of Daniels’s Accountability for Reasonableness

AU - Badano, Gabriele

PY - 2018/3

Y1 - 2018/3

U2 - 10.1007/s10728-017-0343-9

DO - 10.1007/s10728-017-0343-9

M3 - Article

SN - 1065-3058

VL - 26

JO - Health Care Analysis

JF - Health Care Analysis

IS - 1

ER -