By the same authors

From the same journal

From the same journal

Individual participant data validation of the PICNICC prediction model for febrile neutropenia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Full text download(s)

Published copy (DOI)


  • PICNICC Collaborative


Publication details

JournalArchives of Disease in Childhood
DateAccepted/In press - 18 Oct 2019
DateE-pub ahead of print - 5 Nov 2019
DatePublished (current) - 17 Apr 2020
Issue number5
Number of pages7
Pages (from-to)439-445
Early online date5/11/19
Original languageEnglish


BACKGROUND: Risk-stratified approaches to managing cancer therapies and their consequent complications rely on accurate predictions to work effectively. The risk-stratified management of fever with neutropenia is one such very common area of management in paediatric practice. Such rules are frequently produced and promoted without adequate confirmation of their accuracy.

METHODS: An individual participant data meta-analytic validation of the 'Predicting Infectious ComplicatioNs In Children with Cancer' (PICNICC) prediction model for microbiologically documented infection in paediatric fever with neutropenia was undertaken. Pooled estimates were produced using random-effects meta-analysis of the area under the curve-receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC), calibration slope and ratios of expected versus observed cases (E/O).

RESULTS: The PICNICC model was poorly predictive of microbiologically documented infection (MDI) in these validation cohorts. The pooled AUC-ROC was 0.59, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.78, tau2=0, compared with derivation value of 0.72, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.76. There was poor discrimination (pooled slope estimate 0.03, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.26) and calibration in the large (pooled E/O ratio 1.48, 95% CI 0.87 to 2.1). Three different simple recalibration approaches failed to improve performance meaningfully.

CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis shows the PICNICC model should not be used at admission to predict MDI. Further work should focus on validating alternative prediction models. Validation across multiple cohorts from diverse locations is essential before widespread clinical adoption of such rules to avoid overtreating or undertreating children with fever with neutropenia.

Bibliographical note

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019.


Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations