By the same authors

From the same journal

From the same journal

Introducing physically active lessons in UK secondary schools: feasibility study and pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Full text download(s)

Published copy (DOI)

Author(s)

  • Catherine Gammon
  • Katie Morton
  • Andrew Atkin
  • Kirsten Corder
  • Andy Daly-Smith
  • Thomas Quarmby
  • Marc Suhrcke
  • David Turner
  • Esther van Sluijs

Department/unit(s)

Publication details

JournalBMJ Open
DateAccepted/In press - 18 Feb 2019
DatePublished (current) - 6 May 2019
Issue number5
Volume9
Number of pages13
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Assess feasibility, acceptability and costs of delivering a physically active lessons (PAL) training programme to secondary school teachers and explore preliminary effectiveness for reducing pupils' sedentary time.

DESIGN AND SETTING: Secondary schools in East England; one school participated in a pre-post feasibility study, two in a pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial. In the pilot trial, blinding to group assignment was not possible.

PARTICIPANTS: Across studies, 321 randomly selected students (51% male; mean age: 12.9 years), 78 teachers (35% male) and 2 assistant head teachers enrolled; 296 (92%) students, 69 (88%) teachers and 2 assistant head teachers completed the studies.

INTERVENTION: PAL training was delivered to teachers over two after-school sessions. Teachers were made aware of how to integrate movement into lessons; strategies included students collecting data from the environment for class activities and completing activities posted on classroom walls, instead of sitting at desks.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Quantitative and qualitative data were collected to assess feasibility and acceptability of PAL training and delivery. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and ~8 weeks post-training; measures included accelerometer-assessed activity, self-reported well-being and observations of time-on-task. Process evaluation was conducted at follow-up.

RESULTS: In the feasibility study, teachers reported good acceptability of PAL training and mixed experiences of delivering PAL. In the pilot study, teachers' acceptability of training was lower and teachers identified aspects of the training in need of review, including the outdoor PAL training and learning challenge of PAL strategies. In both studies, students and assistant head teachers reported good acceptability of the intervention. Preliminary effectiveness for reducing students' sedentary time was not demonstrated in either study.

CONCLUSIONS: No evidence of preliminary effectiveness on the primary outcome and mixed reports of teachers' acceptability of PAL training suggest the need to review the training. The results do not support continuation of research with the current intervention.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN38409550.

Bibliographical note

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations