By the same authors

From the same journal

Is the Levels of Processing effect language-limited?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Full text download(s)

Author(s)

Department/unit(s)

Publication details

JournalJournal of Memory and Language
DateAccepted/In press - 4 May 2016
DateE-pub ahead of print - 30 May 2016
DatePublished (current) - Feb 2017
Volume92
Pages (from-to)1-13
Early online date30/05/16
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

The concept of Levels of Processing (LOP), proposing that deep coding enhances retention,has played a central role in the study of episodic memory. Evidence has however been based almost entirely on retention of individual words. Across five experiments, we compare LOP effects between visual and verbal stimuli, using judgments of pleasantness as a method of inducing deep encoding and a range of shallow encoding judgments selected so as to be applicable to both verbal and visual stimuli. LOP effects were consistent but modest across the visual stimuli (mean effect size 0.5). In contrast, LOP effects for verbal stimuli varied widely, from modest for people’s names and unfamiliar animals (mean effect size 0.6) to large for familiar animals and household items (mean effect size 1.4), typical of the dramatic LOP effects that characterize the existing verbal literature. We interpret our data through the Gibsonian concept of ‘‘affordance”, proposing that visual and verbal stimuli
vary in the number and richness of features they afford, and that access to such features will in turn depend on encoding strategy. Our hypothesis links readily with Nairne’s feature model of long-term memory.

Bibliographical note

© 2016, Elsevier. This is an author-produced version of the published paper. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details

    Research areas

  • Levels of processing; Long-term memory; Affordance; Visual memory; Verbal memory; Encoding

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations