James et al. reply

Alex James, Jonathan W. Pitchford, Michael J. Plank

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Saavedra and Stouffer claim that the results of James et al. are a consequence of the method used to randomize interaction matrices. We recognize the importance of examining alternative randomization schemes and have repeated our analysis using their methods. However, we find no evidence that ‘reconfirms the importance of nestedness in mutualistic communities’
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)E2-E3
Number of pages2
Issue number7463
Early online date21 Aug 2013
Publication statusPublished - 22 Aug 2013

Cite this