By the same authors

From the same journal

From the same journal

Jurisdiction and scale: rent arrears, social housing, and human rights

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review



Publication details

JournalJournal of Law and Society
DatePublished - Jun 2012
Issue number2
Number of pages27
Pages (from-to)269-295
Original languageEnglish


This paper draws on the recent work of Mariana Valverde on jurisdiction and scale to frame a study of the interaction between mandatory possession proceedings brought by one particular type of social housing provider - housing associations - and national as well as human rights law. It was the explicit political choice to focus social housing provision on housing associations, as opposed to local authorities, which opened up the mandatory possession jurisdiction. The essence of the argument is that, despite the apparent incommensurability of these different scales and jurisdictions, they are able to accommodate each other quite happily. Two sets of texts are used to develop this argument. First, consideration is given to the legal technicality through which mandatory possession proceedings might be challenged. Second, we draw on data from a study of housing associations practices and policies on the use of one particular mandatory ground of possession for rent arrears, demonstrating the way in which scale and jurisdiction, political rationality and technologies intertwine.

    Research areas

  • jurisdiction; , scale; , legal technicality; , possession;

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations