By the same authors

From the same journal

From the same journal

Justice and Constructivism

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Full text download(s)

Published copy (DOI)

Author(s)

Department/unit(s)

Publication details

JournalPolitical studies review
DatePublished - May 2015
Issue number2
Volume13
Pages (from-to)176-183
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Albert Weale’s Democratic Justice and the Social Contract is an important book. It offers an innovative and original (proceduralist) account of justice. In so doing, it places what Brian Barry called ‘the empirical method’ at the centre of normative political philosophy’s attempts to generate determinate answers to moral questions. This article – written from the perspective of someone sympathetic to both the commitment to mutual advantage and the empirical method – focuses on the kind of argument it is that Weale is offering and in particular on the nature of his constructivist project. It argues that Weale’s commitment to equality lies outside the constructivist project and that this undermines his aspiration to genuine constructivism. The article goes on to consider, on the basis of arguments found in Democratic Justice and the Social Contract, various ways in which Weale might have grounded his egalitarian commitments from within the constructivist project.

Bibliographical note

(c) The Author. This is an author produced version of a paper accepted for publication in Political Studies Review. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy.

    Research areas

  • Weale, Social contract, Constructivism, Justice

Activities

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations