By the same authors

Kant on doxastic voluntarism and its implications for epistemic responsibility

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review



Publication details

JournalKant Yearbook
DatePublished - 2013
Number of pages18
Pages (from-to)33-50
Original languageEnglish


This paper shows that Kant’s account of cognition can be used to defend epistemic responsibility against the double threat of either being committed to implausible versions of doxastic voluntarism, or failing to account for a sufficiently robust connection between the will and belief. Whilst we have no direct control over our beliefs, we have two forms of indirect doxastic control that are sufficient to ground epistemic responsibility. It is because we have direct control over our capacity to judge as well as the epistemic principles that govern belief acquisition that we have indirect control over the beliefs we thereby acquire.

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations