Key Recommendations from the MedtecHTA Project

Rosanna Tarricone, Aleksandra Torbica, Mike Drummond, (Iglesias CP member of MedtecHTA group) MedtecHTA Project Group , Cynthia Paola Iglesias Urrutia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


There are particular characteristics ofMedical Devices, such as the device–user interaction, the incremental nature of innovation and the broader organizational impact that lead to additional challenges for health technology assessment (HTA). The project explored key aspects of the conduct andmethods ofHTAforMDs. Systematic reviews and original research studieswere conducted todetermine improvements inprocesses andmethods that could enhance the potential forHTAand optimize the diffusion ofMDs. Regulatory processes for MDs should be more closely aligned, the HTA evaluative framework should be harmonized and processes for conditional coverage and evidence development should be used. The methods for HTA should consider MDs as complex interventions, require the establishment of high quality registries, consider an iterative approach to the evaluation over time, recognize and allow for the particular characteristics of devices and use appropriate approaches for confounder adjustment in comparative effectiveness studies. To optimize the diffusion, a common classification should be developed across countries in order to facilitate international comparisons, factors driving diffusion should be explored in HTA reports and physiciansˈ personal goals and motivation should be better understood. The key recommendations of the MedtecHTA project should improve the conduct and use of HTA for MDs.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)145-152
Number of pages8
JournalHealth Economics
Issue numberSuppl 1
Early online date31 Jan 2017
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2017

Bibliographical note

© 2017 The Authors. Health Economics published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


  • medical devices
  • Health Technology Assessment
  • MedtecHTA
  • methods
  • recommendations
  • economic evaluation
  • health technology assessment

Cite this