Lending an ear to feedback systems: evaluation of recovery and non-response in psychotherapy in a German outpatient setting

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

Lending an ear to feedback systems : evaluation of recovery and non-response in psychotherapy in a German outpatient setting. / Lutz, Wolfgang; Böhnke, Jan R; Köck, Katharina.

In: Community mental health journal, Vol. 47, No. 3, 06.2011, p. 311-7.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

Lutz, W, Böhnke, JR & Köck, K 2011, 'Lending an ear to feedback systems: evaluation of recovery and non-response in psychotherapy in a German outpatient setting', Community mental health journal, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 311-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-010-9307-3

APA

Lutz, W., Böhnke, J. R., & Köck, K. (2011). Lending an ear to feedback systems: evaluation of recovery and non-response in psychotherapy in a German outpatient setting. Community mental health journal, 47(3), 311-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-010-9307-3

Vancouver

Lutz W, Böhnke JR, Köck K. Lending an ear to feedback systems: evaluation of recovery and non-response in psychotherapy in a German outpatient setting. Community mental health journal. 2011 Jun;47(3):311-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-010-9307-3

Author

Lutz, Wolfgang ; Böhnke, Jan R ; Köck, Katharina. / Lending an ear to feedback systems : evaluation of recovery and non-response in psychotherapy in a German outpatient setting. In: Community mental health journal. 2011 ; Vol. 47, No. 3. pp. 311-7.

Bibtex - Download

@article{111215e9677645de8be8134a7feed602,
title = "Lending an ear to feedback systems: evaluation of recovery and non-response in psychotherapy in a German outpatient setting",
abstract = "Systems providing feedback on treatment progress have been implemented in outpatient psychotherapy. They are recognized as a helpful tool to identify possible treatment failures. This report presents the ideas underlying the planning of feedback interventions and the implementation of such programs into practice settings. Strategies to identify patients at risk for treatment failure (rationally- and empirically-derived decision rules) are presented. Additionally, evidence for the usefulness of feedback systems is discussed. The report ends with the description of an ongoing feedback intervention study in private practices in Germany (aimed at gathering information on 400 therapists with 2,000 patients).",
keywords = "Outpatients, Humans, Evidence-Based Practice, Decision Making, Psychometrics, Ambulatory Care, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Mental Disorders, Psychotherapy, Treatment Outcome, Feedback, Germany, Female, Male",
author = "Wolfgang Lutz and B{\"o}hnke, {Jan R} and Katharina K{\"o}ck",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s10597-010-9307-3",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "311--7",
journal = "Community mental health journal",
issn = "1573-2789",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lending an ear to feedback systems

T2 - evaluation of recovery and non-response in psychotherapy in a German outpatient setting

AU - Lutz, Wolfgang

AU - Böhnke, Jan R

AU - Köck, Katharina

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - Systems providing feedback on treatment progress have been implemented in outpatient psychotherapy. They are recognized as a helpful tool to identify possible treatment failures. This report presents the ideas underlying the planning of feedback interventions and the implementation of such programs into practice settings. Strategies to identify patients at risk for treatment failure (rationally- and empirically-derived decision rules) are presented. Additionally, evidence for the usefulness of feedback systems is discussed. The report ends with the description of an ongoing feedback intervention study in private practices in Germany (aimed at gathering information on 400 therapists with 2,000 patients).

AB - Systems providing feedback on treatment progress have been implemented in outpatient psychotherapy. They are recognized as a helpful tool to identify possible treatment failures. This report presents the ideas underlying the planning of feedback interventions and the implementation of such programs into practice settings. Strategies to identify patients at risk for treatment failure (rationally- and empirically-derived decision rules) are presented. Additionally, evidence for the usefulness of feedback systems is discussed. The report ends with the description of an ongoing feedback intervention study in private practices in Germany (aimed at gathering information on 400 therapists with 2,000 patients).

KW - Outpatients

KW - Humans

KW - Evidence-Based Practice

KW - Decision Making

KW - Psychometrics

KW - Ambulatory Care

KW - Quality Assurance, Health Care

KW - Mental Disorders

KW - Psychotherapy

KW - Treatment Outcome

KW - Feedback

KW - Germany

KW - Female

KW - Male

U2 - 10.1007/s10597-010-9307-3

DO - 10.1007/s10597-010-9307-3

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 311

EP - 317

JO - Community mental health journal

JF - Community mental health journal

SN - 1573-2789

IS - 3

ER -