Lithic Residue Survival and Characterisation at Star Carr: a burial experiment

Shannon Charmaine Klassen Croft; Gilliane Monnier; Anita Radini; Aimee Patrice Little; Nicola Milner

doi:10.11141/ia.42.5

Lithic Residue Survival and Characterisation at Star Carr: a burial experiment

Shannon Charmaine Klassen Croft, Gilliane Monnier, Anita Radini, Aimee Patrice Little, Nicola Milner

Archaeology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

A modern burial experiment was devised to test microscopic residue survival in acidic peat and slightly acidic clay soils at the Early Mesolithic site of Star Carr (North Yorkshire, UK), and at nearby control location. The experiment addresses concerns regarding the applicability of residue analysis in varied burial environments, and particularly in highly acidic archaeological conditions. Flint flakes (n= 78, including blank controls) were used on twelve plant, animal, and mineral materials to create residues and then buried. The residues were examined 1 month and 11 months after burial. An unburied reference collection containing the same twelve residue types in a fresh state was compared to the buried residues to assess diagenesis. The residue types that survived across all burial conditions and time intervalswere: softwood tissue, tree resin, bird feathers, squirrel hair, and red ochre. During microscopic analysis, it became clear that many residues lack diagnostic traits, and thus an assessment of the extent to which each residue can be identified was conducted. The degree to which residues were able to be identified was further investigated with a variable pressure scanning electron microscope (SEM). SEM images of the reference residues were compared to the reflected VLM micrographs of the same residues, which improved characterisation in some cases. Residues were grouped into three categories (diagnostic, distinctive, and nondistinctive) within a visual characterisation guide. Our in situ microscopic analyses indicated that few residue types have diagnostic traits that allow them to be identified unambiguously, and thus further characterisation techniques are often required.

Original language	English
Article number	5
Journal	Internet Archaeology
Issue number	42
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.42.5
Publication status	Published - 6 Sept 2016

Keywords

Archaeology
Characterisation
Diagenesis
Experimental archaeology
Reflected visible light microscopy (VLM)
Residues
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
Star carr
Wetland

Access to Document

10.11141/ia.42.5Licence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{a9b174b027184d27a9732bb175330518,

title = "Lithic Residue Survival and Characterisation at Star Carr: a burial experiment",

abstract = "A modern burial experiment was devised to test microscopic residue survival in acidic peat and slightly acidic clay soils at the Early Mesolithic site of Star Carr (North Yorkshire, UK), and at nearby control location. The experiment addresses concerns regarding the applicability of residue analysis in varied burial environments, and particularly in highly acidic archaeological conditions. Flint flakes (n= 78, including blank controls) were used on twelve plant, animal, and mineral materials to create residues and then buried. The residues were examined 1 month and 11 months after burial. An unburied reference collection containing the same twelve residue types in a fresh state was compared to the buried residues to assess diagenesis. The residue types that survived across all burial conditions and time intervalswere: softwood tissue, tree resin, bird feathers, squirrel hair, and red ochre. During microscopic analysis, it became clear that many residues lack diagnostic traits, and thus an assessment of the extent to which each residue can be identified was conducted. The degree to which residues were able to be identified was further investigated with a variable pressure scanning electron microscope (SEM). SEM images of the reference residues were compared to the reflected VLM micrographs of the same residues, which improved characterisation in some cases. Residues were grouped into three categories (diagnostic, distinctive, and nondistinctive) within a visual characterisation guide. Our in situ microscopic analyses indicated that few residue types have diagnostic traits that allow them to be identified unambiguously, and thus further characterisation techniques are often required.",

keywords = "Archaeology, Characterisation, Diagenesis, Experimental archaeology, Reflected visible light microscopy (VLM), Residues, Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Star carr, Wetland",

author = "Croft, {Shannon Charmaine Klassen} and Gilliane Monnier and Anita Radini and Little, {Aimee Patrice} and Nicola Milner",

year = "2016",

month = sep,

day = "6",

doi = "10.11141/ia.42.5",

language = "English",

journal = "Internet Archaeology",

issn = "1363-5387",

publisher = "University of York",

number = "42",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lithic Residue Survival and Characterisation at Star Carr

T2 - a burial experiment

AU - Croft, Shannon Charmaine Klassen

AU - Monnier, Gilliane

AU - Radini, Anita

AU - Little, Aimee Patrice

AU - Milner, Nicola

PY - 2016/9/6

Y1 - 2016/9/6

N2 - A modern burial experiment was devised to test microscopic residue survival in acidic peat and slightly acidic clay soils at the Early Mesolithic site of Star Carr (North Yorkshire, UK), and at nearby control location. The experiment addresses concerns regarding the applicability of residue analysis in varied burial environments, and particularly in highly acidic archaeological conditions. Flint flakes (n= 78, including blank controls) were used on twelve plant, animal, and mineral materials to create residues and then buried. The residues were examined 1 month and 11 months after burial. An unburied reference collection containing the same twelve residue types in a fresh state was compared to the buried residues to assess diagenesis. The residue types that survived across all burial conditions and time intervalswere: softwood tissue, tree resin, bird feathers, squirrel hair, and red ochre. During microscopic analysis, it became clear that many residues lack diagnostic traits, and thus an assessment of the extent to which each residue can be identified was conducted. The degree to which residues were able to be identified was further investigated with a variable pressure scanning electron microscope (SEM). SEM images of the reference residues were compared to the reflected VLM micrographs of the same residues, which improved characterisation in some cases. Residues were grouped into three categories (diagnostic, distinctive, and nondistinctive) within a visual characterisation guide. Our in situ microscopic analyses indicated that few residue types have diagnostic traits that allow them to be identified unambiguously, and thus further characterisation techniques are often required.

AB - A modern burial experiment was devised to test microscopic residue survival in acidic peat and slightly acidic clay soils at the Early Mesolithic site of Star Carr (North Yorkshire, UK), and at nearby control location. The experiment addresses concerns regarding the applicability of residue analysis in varied burial environments, and particularly in highly acidic archaeological conditions. Flint flakes (n= 78, including blank controls) were used on twelve plant, animal, and mineral materials to create residues and then buried. The residues were examined 1 month and 11 months after burial. An unburied reference collection containing the same twelve residue types in a fresh state was compared to the buried residues to assess diagenesis. The residue types that survived across all burial conditions and time intervalswere: softwood tissue, tree resin, bird feathers, squirrel hair, and red ochre. During microscopic analysis, it became clear that many residues lack diagnostic traits, and thus an assessment of the extent to which each residue can be identified was conducted. The degree to which residues were able to be identified was further investigated with a variable pressure scanning electron microscope (SEM). SEM images of the reference residues were compared to the reflected VLM micrographs of the same residues, which improved characterisation in some cases. Residues were grouped into three categories (diagnostic, distinctive, and nondistinctive) within a visual characterisation guide. Our in situ microscopic analyses indicated that few residue types have diagnostic traits that allow them to be identified unambiguously, and thus further characterisation techniques are often required.

KW - Archaeology

KW - Characterisation

KW - Diagenesis

KW - Experimental archaeology

KW - Reflected visible light microscopy (VLM)

KW - Residues

KW - Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

KW - Star carr

KW - Wetland

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84998886235&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.11141/ia.42.5

DO - 10.11141/ia.42.5

M3 - Article

SN - 1363-5387

JO - Internet Archaeology

JF - Internet Archaeology

IS - 42

M1 - 5

ER -

Lithic Residue Survival and Characterisation at Star Carr: a burial experiment

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Profiles

Aimee Patrice Little

Cite this