By the same authors

From the same journal

Local costs of conservation exceed those borne by the global majority

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Full text download(s)

Published copy (DOI)

Author(s)

Department/unit(s)

Publication details

JournalGlobal Ecology and Conservation
DateAccepted/In press - 5 Apr 2018
DateE-pub ahead of print (current) - 17 Apr 2018
Volume14
Number of pages10
Pages (from-to)1-10
Early online date17/04/18
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Cost data are crucial in conservation planning to identify more efficient and equitable land use options. However, many studies focus on just one cost type and neglect others, particularly those borne locally. We develop,
for a high priority conservation area, spatial models of two local costs that arise from protected areas: foregone agricultural opportunities and increased wildlife damage. We then map these across the study area and compare
them to the direct costs of reserve management, finding that local costs exceed management costs. Whilst benefits of conservation accrue to the global community, significant costs are borne by those living closest. Where
livelihoods depend upon opportunities forgone or diminished by conservation intervention, outcomes are limited. Activities can be displaced (leakage); rules can be broken (intervention does not work); or the intervention
forces a shift in livelihood profiles (potentially to the detriment of local peoples’ welfare). These raise concerns for both conservation and development outcomes and timely consideration of local costs is vital in conservation
planning tools and processes.

Bibliographical note

©2018 The Authors

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations