MDI-QKD: Continuous- versus discrete-variables at metropolitan distances

Stefano Pirandola; Carlo Ottaviani; Gaetana Spedalieri; Christian Weedbrook; Samuel L. Braunstein; Seth Lloyd; Tobias Gehring; Christian S. Jacobsen; Ulrik L. Andersen

doi:10.1038/nphoton.2015.207

MDI-QKD: Continuous- versus discrete-variables at metropolitan distances

Stefano Pirandola, Carlo Ottaviani, Gaetana Spedalieri, Christian Weedbrook, Samuel L. Braunstein, Seth Lloyd, Tobias Gehring, Christian S. Jacobsen, Ulrik L. Andersen

Computer Science

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

In a comment, Xu, Curty, Qi, Qian, and Lo claimed that discrete-variable (DV) measurement device independent (MDI) quantum key distribution (QKD) would compete with its continuous-variable (CV) counterpart at metropolitan distances. Actually, Xu et al.'s analysis supports exactly the opposite by showing that the experimental rate of our CV protocol (achieved with practical room-temperature devices) remains one order of magnitude higher than their purely-numerical and over-optimistic extrapolation for qubits, based on nearly-ideal parameters and cryogenic detectors (unsuitable solutions for a realistic metropolitan network, which is expected to run on cheap room-temperature devices, potentially even mobile). The experimental rate of our protocol (expressed as bits per relay use) is confirmed to be two-three orders of magnitude higher than the rate of any realistic simulation of practical DV-MDI-QKD over short-medium distances. Of course this does not mean that DV-MDI-QKD networks should not be investigated or built, but increasing their rate is a non-trivial practical problem clearly beyond the analysis of Xu et al. Finally, in order to clarify the facts, we also refute a series of incorrect arguments against CV-MDI-QKD and, more generally, CV-QKD, which were made by Xu et al. with the goal of supporting their thesis.

Original language	English
Article number	207
Number of pages	2
Journal	Nature photonics
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2015.207
Publication status	Published - 22 Jun 2015

Keywords

quant-ph
physics.optics

Access to Document

10.1038/nphoton.2015.207

Cite this

@article{2f6144c550294e4e95792f27c9693bd4,

title = "MDI-QKD: Continuous- versus discrete-variables at metropolitan distances",

abstract = "In a comment, Xu, Curty, Qi, Qian, and Lo claimed that discrete-variable (DV) measurement device independent (MDI) quantum key distribution (QKD) would compete with its continuous-variable (CV) counterpart at metropolitan distances. Actually, Xu et al.'s analysis supports exactly the opposite by showing that the experimental rate of our CV protocol (achieved with practical room-temperature devices) remains one order of magnitude higher than their purely-numerical and over-optimistic extrapolation for qubits, based on nearly-ideal parameters and cryogenic detectors (unsuitable solutions for a realistic metropolitan network, which is expected to run on cheap room-temperature devices, potentially even mobile). The experimental rate of our protocol (expressed as bits per relay use) is confirmed to be two-three orders of magnitude higher than the rate of any realistic simulation of practical DV-MDI-QKD over short-medium distances. Of course this does not mean that DV-MDI-QKD networks should not be investigated or built, but increasing their rate is a non-trivial practical problem clearly beyond the analysis of Xu et al. Finally, in order to clarify the facts, we also refute a series of incorrect arguments against CV-MDI-QKD and, more generally, CV-QKD, which were made by Xu et al. with the goal of supporting their thesis.",

keywords = "quant-ph, physics.optics",

author = "Stefano Pirandola and Carlo Ottaviani and Gaetana Spedalieri and Christian Weedbrook and Braunstein, {Samuel L.} and Seth Lloyd and Tobias Gehring and Jacobsen, {Christian S.} and Andersen, {Ulrik L.}",

year = "2015",

month = jun,

day = "22",

doi = "10.1038/nphoton.2015.207",

language = "English",

journal = "Nature photonics",

issn = "1749-4885",

publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - MDI-QKD: Continuous- versus discrete-variables at metropolitan distances

AU - Pirandola, Stefano

AU - Ottaviani, Carlo

AU - Spedalieri, Gaetana

AU - Weedbrook, Christian

AU - Braunstein, Samuel L.

AU - Lloyd, Seth

AU - Gehring, Tobias

AU - Jacobsen, Christian S.

AU - Andersen, Ulrik L.

PY - 2015/6/22

Y1 - 2015/6/22

N2 - In a comment, Xu, Curty, Qi, Qian, and Lo claimed that discrete-variable (DV) measurement device independent (MDI) quantum key distribution (QKD) would compete with its continuous-variable (CV) counterpart at metropolitan distances. Actually, Xu et al.'s analysis supports exactly the opposite by showing that the experimental rate of our CV protocol (achieved with practical room-temperature devices) remains one order of magnitude higher than their purely-numerical and over-optimistic extrapolation for qubits, based on nearly-ideal parameters and cryogenic detectors (unsuitable solutions for a realistic metropolitan network, which is expected to run on cheap room-temperature devices, potentially even mobile). The experimental rate of our protocol (expressed as bits per relay use) is confirmed to be two-three orders of magnitude higher than the rate of any realistic simulation of practical DV-MDI-QKD over short-medium distances. Of course this does not mean that DV-MDI-QKD networks should not be investigated or built, but increasing their rate is a non-trivial practical problem clearly beyond the analysis of Xu et al. Finally, in order to clarify the facts, we also refute a series of incorrect arguments against CV-MDI-QKD and, more generally, CV-QKD, which were made by Xu et al. with the goal of supporting their thesis.

AB - In a comment, Xu, Curty, Qi, Qian, and Lo claimed that discrete-variable (DV) measurement device independent (MDI) quantum key distribution (QKD) would compete with its continuous-variable (CV) counterpart at metropolitan distances. Actually, Xu et al.'s analysis supports exactly the opposite by showing that the experimental rate of our CV protocol (achieved with practical room-temperature devices) remains one order of magnitude higher than their purely-numerical and over-optimistic extrapolation for qubits, based on nearly-ideal parameters and cryogenic detectors (unsuitable solutions for a realistic metropolitan network, which is expected to run on cheap room-temperature devices, potentially even mobile). The experimental rate of our protocol (expressed as bits per relay use) is confirmed to be two-three orders of magnitude higher than the rate of any realistic simulation of practical DV-MDI-QKD over short-medium distances. Of course this does not mean that DV-MDI-QKD networks should not be investigated or built, but increasing their rate is a non-trivial practical problem clearly beyond the analysis of Xu et al. Finally, in order to clarify the facts, we also refute a series of incorrect arguments against CV-MDI-QKD and, more generally, CV-QKD, which were made by Xu et al. with the goal of supporting their thesis.

KW - quant-ph

KW - physics.optics

U2 - 10.1038/nphoton.2015.207

DO - 10.1038/nphoton.2015.207

M3 - Article

SN - 1749-4885

JO - Nature photonics

JF - Nature photonics

M1 - 207

ER -