Mitigation against Natural Disasters: Does Dynamic Capability Matter?

Raveekarn Aiemwongnukul; Chee Yew Wong; Luisa Delfa Huaccho Huatuco

Mitigation against Natural Disasters: Does Dynamic Capability Matter?

Raveekarn Aiemwongnukul, Chee Yew Wong , Luisa Delfa Huaccho Huatuco

The York Management School

Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › peer-review

Abstract

Given the increasing frequency and severity of natural disasters on supply chains, it is timely to have a fresh look at the mitigation capability concepts, e.g. resilience and risk management. This paper explores if there is a need for dynamic capability to mitigate against the impacts of natural disasters. Based on thematic analysis of 30 interviews of academics, experts and practitioners, the paper identifies 17 second-order themes related to dynamic capabilities framework: sensing, seizing, and transforming/ reconfiguring. These capabilities serve as organizational processes that protect the supply chain from the disruptions, as well as to learn and improve the routines.

Original language	English
Number of pages	10
Publication status	Published - 20 Jun 2016
Event	EurOMA - Trondheim, Norway Duration: 17 Jun 2016 → 22 Jun 2016

Conference

Conference	EurOMA
Country/Territory	Norway
City	Trondheim
Period	17/06/16 → 22/06/16

Embargoed Document

final paper proceedings
Final published version, 442 KB

Cite this

@conference{e9b2052b691048ce908f72bfc04ba3cd,

title = "Mitigation against Natural Disasters: Does Dynamic Capability Matter?",

abstract = "Given the increasing frequency and severity of natural disasters on supply chains, it is timely to have a fresh look at the mitigation capability concepts, e.g. resilience and risk management. This paper explores if there is a need for dynamic capability to mitigate against the impacts of natural disasters. Based on thematic analysis of 30 interviews of academics, experts and practitioners, the paper identifies 17 second-order themes related to dynamic capabilities framework: sensing, seizing, and transforming/ reconfiguring. These capabilities serve as organizational processes that protect the supply chain from the disruptions, as well as to learn and improve the routines.",

author = "Raveekarn Aiemwongnukul and Wong, {Chee Yew} and {Huaccho Huatuco}, {Luisa Delfa}",

year = "2016",

month = jun,

day = "20",

language = "English",

note = "EurOMA ; Conference date: 17-06-2016 Through 22-06-2016",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Mitigation against Natural Disasters

T2 - EurOMA

AU - Aiemwongnukul, Raveekarn

AU - Wong , Chee Yew

AU - Huaccho Huatuco, Luisa Delfa

PY - 2016/6/20

Y1 - 2016/6/20

N2 - Given the increasing frequency and severity of natural disasters on supply chains, it is timely to have a fresh look at the mitigation capability concepts, e.g. resilience and risk management. This paper explores if there is a need for dynamic capability to mitigate against the impacts of natural disasters. Based on thematic analysis of 30 interviews of academics, experts and practitioners, the paper identifies 17 second-order themes related to dynamic capabilities framework: sensing, seizing, and transforming/ reconfiguring. These capabilities serve as organizational processes that protect the supply chain from the disruptions, as well as to learn and improve the routines.

AB - Given the increasing frequency and severity of natural disasters on supply chains, it is timely to have a fresh look at the mitigation capability concepts, e.g. resilience and risk management. This paper explores if there is a need for dynamic capability to mitigate against the impacts of natural disasters. Based on thematic analysis of 30 interviews of academics, experts and practitioners, the paper identifies 17 second-order themes related to dynamic capabilities framework: sensing, seizing, and transforming/ reconfiguring. These capabilities serve as organizational processes that protect the supply chain from the disruptions, as well as to learn and improve the routines.

M3 - Paper

Y2 - 17 June 2016 through 22 June 2016

ER -