TY - JOUR
T1 - Multi machine scaling of fuel retention in 4 carbon dominated tokamaks
AU - Tsitrone, E.
AU - Pégourié, B.
AU - Artaud, J.F.
AU - Brosset, C.
AU - Bucalossi, J.
AU - Corre, Y.
AU - Dittmar, T.
AU - Gauthier, E.
AU - Languille, P.
AU - Linez, F.
AU - Loarer, T.
AU - Marandet, Y.
AU - Martin, C.
AU - Roubin, P.
AU - Kallenbach, A.
AU - Krieger, K.
AU - Mayer, M.
AU - Neu, R.
AU - Rohde, V.
AU - Roth, J.
AU - Brezinsek, S.
AU - Kirschner, A.
AU - Kreter, A.
AU - Litnovsky, A.
AU - Philipps, V.
AU - Wienhold, P.
AU - Rubel, M.
AU - Likonen, J.
AU - Coad, P.
AU - Lipschultz, B.
AU - Doerner, R.
PY - 2011/8/1
Y1 - 2011/8/1
N2 - In order to benchmark predictions for the in vessel tritium inventory in ITER, a survey of fuel retention measured in 4 carbon dominated tokamaks (TEXTOR, ASDEX Upgrade in the 2002-2003 carbon configuration, Tore Supra and JET) was performed, showing retention rates from ∼1 g D/h in TEXTOR (L mode, limiter machine) up to ∼6-12 g D/h in AUG (H mode, divertor machine). A simple scaling used for ITER predictions is applied for comparison with experimental values: (1) estimate of wall fluxes, (2) estimate of the gross carbon erosion, (3) estimate of the net erosion/redeposition assuming a redeposition fraction and (4) estimate of the retention rate using D/C ratio scalings. The validity of each step is discussed, showing that this approach yields the right order of magnitude, but tends to underestimate the experimental values unless a high wall flux, a low local redeposition fraction and/or a high D/C ratio are used.
AB - In order to benchmark predictions for the in vessel tritium inventory in ITER, a survey of fuel retention measured in 4 carbon dominated tokamaks (TEXTOR, ASDEX Upgrade in the 2002-2003 carbon configuration, Tore Supra and JET) was performed, showing retention rates from ∼1 g D/h in TEXTOR (L mode, limiter machine) up to ∼6-12 g D/h in AUG (H mode, divertor machine). A simple scaling used for ITER predictions is applied for comparison with experimental values: (1) estimate of wall fluxes, (2) estimate of the gross carbon erosion, (3) estimate of the net erosion/redeposition assuming a redeposition fraction and (4) estimate of the retention rate using D/C ratio scalings. The validity of each step is discussed, showing that this approach yields the right order of magnitude, but tends to underestimate the experimental values unless a high wall flux, a low local redeposition fraction and/or a high D/C ratio are used.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80054840239&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.01.132
DO - 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.01.132
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:80054840239
SN - 0022-3115
VL - 415
JO - Journal of Nuclear Materials
JF - Journal of Nuclear Materials
IS - 1 SUPPL
ER -