By the same authors

From the same journal

Multiprocessors and Asynchronous Event Handling in the Real-Time Specification for Java

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review



Publication details

JournalThe Computer Journal
DatePublished - Aug 2011
Issue number8
Number of pages16
Pages (from-to)1308-1324
Original languageEnglish


The Real-Time Specification for Java (RTSJ) is silent on multiprocessor issues. It attempts not to preclude multiprocessor implementations but provides no direct support. Many areas of the RTSJ leave an implementation considerable freedom on how it provides the defined functionality. One such area is the asynchronous event handling (AEH) model. Events are fired and associated handlers are scheduled for execution in response; handlers have defined scheduling parameters and deadlines. The primary goal of the AEH model is to support a lightweight real-time concurrency model. Hence handlers, in general, do not have dedicated threads. Rather, the implementation is responsible for ensuring that all handlers meet their deadlines. Typically real-time threads are assigned to execute handlers by the implementation. This paper discusses the issues associated with implementing the AEH model on multiprocessor systems. The emphasis here is on achieving a lightweight model. A model is lightweight if it is able to meet the deadlines of all handlers with as few as possible real-time threads. In the RTSJ this is made more complicated because asynchronous event handlers are allowed to suspend themselves (for example, by waiting on a monitor condition). Such handlers are called blocking handlers. Most of an implementation's freedom comes from being able to optimize the support for those handlers that do not block. The paper first examines all possible releasing sequences of non-blocking handlers on multiprocessor systems. Based on this, it proposes an efficient and scalable AEH mapping model for multiprocessor systems, which limits the number of real-time threads even in the worst case while retaining the schedulability of the system. The proposed model is then examined to prove its safety and liveness requirements using a model checking tool, UPPAAL. The verification and simulation results of the model indicate that the safety and liveness requirements are satisfied. Most importantly, this paper derives the proposed model's greatest lower and least upper bounds of real-time threads required to execute a given number of non-blocking handlers. The greatest lower bound is equal to the number of processors, and the least upper bound is equal to the number of processors times that of the priority levels in the system. In the model, the number of real-time threads required to execute a given number of non-blocking handlers is restricted to between these two bounds depending on the releasing sequence of handlers. Even in the worst case, the model requires the least upper bound of real-time threads which is, in most cases, considerably less than the actual number of handlers in the system. This, in turn, enables the proposed model to be efficient and scalable by reducing time and space overheads, compared with a traditional 1:1 AEH mapping model where each handler is mapped to a single thread.

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations