Naive, resolute or sophisticated? A study of dynamic decision making

John D. Hey, Gianna Lotito

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Dynamically inconsistent decision makers have to decide, implicitly or explicitly, what to do about their dynamic inconsistency. Economic theorists have identified three possible responses-to act naively (thus ignoring the dynamic inconsistency), to act resolutely (not letting their inconsistency affect their behaviour) or to act sophisticatedly (hence taking into account their inconsistency). We use data from a unique experiment (which observes both decisions and evaluations) in order to distinguish these three possibilities. We find that the majority of subjects are either naive or resolute (with slightly more being naive) but very few are sophisticated. These results have important implications for predicting the behaviour of people in dynamic situations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)125
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Risk and Uncertainty
Volume38
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2009

Keywords

  • Dynamic decision making
  • Naivety
  • Sophistication
  • Resoluteness
  • Dynamic inconsistencies
  • EXPECTED UTILITY
  • CHOICE
  • CONSISTENCY
  • PREFERENCES
  • UNCERTAINTY

Cite this