By the same authors

From the same journal

From the same journal

Non-attendance at urgent referral appointments for suspected cancer: a qualitative study to gain understanding from patients and GPs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Full text download(s)

Published copy (DOI)

Author(s)

Department/unit(s)

Publication details

JournalThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
DateAccepted/In press - 20 Aug 2019
DateE-pub ahead of print - 19 Nov 2019
DatePublished (current) - Dec 2019
Issue number689
Volume69
Number of pages10
Pages (from-to)e850-e859
Early online date19/11/19
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The 2-week-wait urgent referral policy in the UK has sought to improve cancer outcomes by accelerating diagnosis and treatment. However, around 5-7% of symptomatic referred patients cancel or do not attend their hospital appointment. While subsequent cancer diagnosis was less likely in non-attenders, those with a diagnosis had worse early mortality outcomes.

AIM: To examine how interpersonal, communication, social, and organisational factors influence a patient's non-attendance.

DESIGN AND SETTING: Qualitative study in GP practices in one Northern English city.

METHOD: In-depth, individual interviews were undertaken face-to-face or by telephone between December 2016 and May 2018, followed by thematic framework analysis.

RESULTS: In this study 21 GPs, and 24 patients who did not attend or had cancelled their appointment were interviewed, deriving a range of potential explanations for non-attendance, including: system flaws; GP difficulties with booking appointments; patient difficulties with navigating the appointment system, particularly older patients and those from more deprived areas; patients leading 'difficult lives'; and patients' expectations of the referral, informed by their beliefs, circumstances, priorities, and the perceived prognosis. GPs recognised the importance of communication with the patient, particularly the need to tailor communication to perceived patient understanding and anxiety. GPs and practices varied in their responses to patient non-attendance, influenced by time pressures and perceptions of patient responsibility.

CONCLUSION: Failure to be seen within 2 weeks of urgent referral resulted from a number of patient and provider factors. The urgent referral process in general practice and cancer services should accommodate patient perceptions and responses, facilitate referral and attendance, and enable responses to patient non-attendance.

Bibliographical note

© British Journal of General Practice 2019.

    Research areas

  • cancer, COMMUNICATION, Diagnosis, no-show, Patients, Primary health care, Socioeconomic factors

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations