By the same authors

From the same journal

From the same journal

Object extraction is not subject to Child Relativized Minimality

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review



Publication details

DatePublished - Jun 2010
Issue number6
Number of pages6
Pages (from-to)1516-1521
Original languageEnglish


Friedmann et al. (2009) propose that the grammar of three-five-year-old children imposes a stricter version of Relativized Minimality that the adult grammar does. This allows them to explain several experimental findings, including the difficulty children have in comprehending object relative clauses when the subject of the relative is a lexical NP, and in comprehending object questions when the object is D(iscourse)-linked. The purpose of this paper is to challenge their analysis, in terms of both its empirical coverage and its implications for a theory of acquisition that assumes continuity. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

    Research areas

  • D(iscourse)-linking, Relativized Minimality, Object extraction, Child language, Continuity, CLAUSES, ACQUISITION

Discover related content

Find related publications, people, projects, datasets and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations