Opinion: Challenges and needs of tropospheric chemical mechanism development

Barbara Ervens; Andrew Rickard; Bernard Aumont; William P.L. Carter; Max McGillen; Abdelwahid Mellouki; John Orlando; Bénédicte Picquet-Varrault; Paul Seakins; William R. Stockwell; Luc Vereecken; Timothy J. Wallington

doi:10.5194/acp-24-13317-2024

Opinion: Challenges and needs of tropospheric chemical mechanism development

Barbara Ervens^*, Andrew Rickard^*, Bernard Aumont, William P.L. Carter, Max McGillen, Abdelwahid Mellouki, John Orlando, Bénédicte Picquet-Varrault, Paul Seakins, William R. Stockwell, Luc Vereecken, Timothy J. Wallington

^*Corresponding author for this work

Chemistry

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Abstract

Chemical mechanisms form the core of atmospheric models to describe degradation pathways of pollutants and ultimately inform air quality and climate policymakers and other stakeholders. The accuracy of chemical mechanisms relies on the quality of their input data, which originate from experimental (laboratory, field, chamber) and theoretical (quantum chemistry, theoretical kinetics, machine learning) studies. The development of robust mechanisms requires rigorous and transparent procedures for data collection, mechanism construction and evaluation and the creation of reduced or operationally defined mechanisms. Developments in analytical techniques have led to a large number of identified chemical species in the atmospheric multiphase system that have proved invaluable for our understanding of atmospheric chemistry. At the same time, advances in software and machine learning tools have enabled automated mechanism generation. We discuss strategies for mechanism development, applying empirical or mechanistic approaches. We show the general workflows, how either approach can lead to robust mechanisms and that the two approaches complement each other, resulting in reliable predictions. Current challenges are discussed related to global change, including shifts in emission scenarios that result in new chemical regimes (e.g., low-NO scenarios, wildfires, mega- and gigacities) and that require the development of new or expanded gas- and aqueous-phase mechanisms. In addition, new mechanisms should be developed to also target oxidation capacity and aerosol chemistry impacting climate, human and ecosystem health.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	13317-13339
Number of pages	23
Journal	Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Volume	24
Issue number	23
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13317-2024
Publication status	Published - 2 Dec 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) 2024.

Access to Document

10.5194/acp-24-13317-2024Licence: CC BY

Opinion: Challenges and needs of tropospheric chemical mechanism development
© Author(s) 2024
Final published version, 1.93 MBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{917ca0a50bd9429ab1fe2a008de1bfa4,

title = "Opinion: Challenges and needs of tropospheric chemical mechanism development",

abstract = "Chemical mechanisms form the core of atmospheric models to describe degradation pathways of pollutants and ultimately inform air quality and climate policymakers and other stakeholders. The accuracy of chemical mechanisms relies on the quality of their input data, which originate from experimental (laboratory, field, chamber) and theoretical (quantum chemistry, theoretical kinetics, machine learning) studies. The development of robust mechanisms requires rigorous and transparent procedures for data collection, mechanism construction and evaluation and the creation of reduced or operationally defined mechanisms. Developments in analytical techniques have led to a large number of identified chemical species in the atmospheric multiphase system that have proved invaluable for our understanding of atmospheric chemistry. At the same time, advances in software and machine learning tools have enabled automated mechanism generation. We discuss strategies for mechanism development, applying empirical or mechanistic approaches. We show the general workflows, how either approach can lead to robust mechanisms and that the two approaches complement each other, resulting in reliable predictions. Current challenges are discussed related to global change, including shifts in emission scenarios that result in new chemical regimes (e.g., low-NO scenarios, wildfires, mega- and gigacities) and that require the development of new or expanded gas- and aqueous-phase mechanisms. In addition, new mechanisms should be developed to also target oxidation capacity and aerosol chemistry impacting climate, human and ecosystem health.",

author = "Barbara Ervens and Andrew Rickard and Bernard Aumont and Carter, {William P.L.} and Max McGillen and Abdelwahid Mellouki and John Orlando and B{\'e}n{\'e}dicte Picquet-Varrault and Paul Seakins and Stockwell, {William R.} and Luc Vereecken and Wallington, {Timothy J.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Author(s) 2024.",

year = "2024",

month = dec,

day = "2",

doi = "10.5194/acp-24-13317-2024",

language = "English",

volume = "24",

pages = "13317--13339",

journal = "Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics",

issn = "1680-7316",

publisher = "Copernicus Publications",

number = "23",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Opinion

T2 - Challenges and needs of tropospheric chemical mechanism development

AU - Ervens, Barbara

AU - Rickard, Andrew

AU - Aumont, Bernard

AU - Carter, William P.L.

AU - McGillen, Max

AU - Mellouki, Abdelwahid

AU - Orlando, John

AU - Picquet-Varrault, Bénédicte

AU - Seakins, Paul

AU - Stockwell, William R.

AU - Vereecken, Luc

AU - Wallington, Timothy J.

PY - 2024/12/2

Y1 - 2024/12/2

N2 - Chemical mechanisms form the core of atmospheric models to describe degradation pathways of pollutants and ultimately inform air quality and climate policymakers and other stakeholders. The accuracy of chemical mechanisms relies on the quality of their input data, which originate from experimental (laboratory, field, chamber) and theoretical (quantum chemistry, theoretical kinetics, machine learning) studies. The development of robust mechanisms requires rigorous and transparent procedures for data collection, mechanism construction and evaluation and the creation of reduced or operationally defined mechanisms. Developments in analytical techniques have led to a large number of identified chemical species in the atmospheric multiphase system that have proved invaluable for our understanding of atmospheric chemistry. At the same time, advances in software and machine learning tools have enabled automated mechanism generation. We discuss strategies for mechanism development, applying empirical or mechanistic approaches. We show the general workflows, how either approach can lead to robust mechanisms and that the two approaches complement each other, resulting in reliable predictions. Current challenges are discussed related to global change, including shifts in emission scenarios that result in new chemical regimes (e.g., low-NO scenarios, wildfires, mega- and gigacities) and that require the development of new or expanded gas- and aqueous-phase mechanisms. In addition, new mechanisms should be developed to also target oxidation capacity and aerosol chemistry impacting climate, human and ecosystem health.

AB - Chemical mechanisms form the core of atmospheric models to describe degradation pathways of pollutants and ultimately inform air quality and climate policymakers and other stakeholders. The accuracy of chemical mechanisms relies on the quality of their input data, which originate from experimental (laboratory, field, chamber) and theoretical (quantum chemistry, theoretical kinetics, machine learning) studies. The development of robust mechanisms requires rigorous and transparent procedures for data collection, mechanism construction and evaluation and the creation of reduced or operationally defined mechanisms. Developments in analytical techniques have led to a large number of identified chemical species in the atmospheric multiphase system that have proved invaluable for our understanding of atmospheric chemistry. At the same time, advances in software and machine learning tools have enabled automated mechanism generation. We discuss strategies for mechanism development, applying empirical or mechanistic approaches. We show the general workflows, how either approach can lead to robust mechanisms and that the two approaches complement each other, resulting in reliable predictions. Current challenges are discussed related to global change, including shifts in emission scenarios that result in new chemical regimes (e.g., low-NO scenarios, wildfires, mega- and gigacities) and that require the development of new or expanded gas- and aqueous-phase mechanisms. In addition, new mechanisms should be developed to also target oxidation capacity and aerosol chemistry impacting climate, human and ecosystem health.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85211252137&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5194/acp-24-13317-2024

DO - 10.5194/acp-24-13317-2024

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85211252137

SN - 1680-7316

VL - 24

SP - 13317

EP - 13339

JO - Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

JF - Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

IS - 23

ER -

Opinion: Challenges and needs of tropospheric chemical mechanism development

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this