Oso, osito ¿a qué venís? Andean Bear Conflict, Conservation and Campesinos in the Colombian Páramos

Ana Maria Garrido Corredor; Hanne Dominique Geertrui Jeannine Cottyn; Santiago Martinez Medina; Christopher Wheatley; Adriana Sanchez; Joshua Daniel Kirshner; Helen Louise Cowie; Julia M. Touza; Piran Crawfurd Limond White

doi:10.3390/su131910489

Oso, osito ¿a qué venís? Andean Bear Conflict, Conservation and Campesinos in the Colombian Páramos

Ana Maria Garrido Corredor, Hanne Dominique Geertrui Jeannine Cottyn, Santiago Martinez Medina, Christopher Wheatley, Adriana Sanchez, Joshua Daniel Kirshner, Helen Louise Cowie, Julia M. Touza, Piran Crawfurd Limond White

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This article proposes a historical, multispecies and ontological approach to human-wildlife conflict (HWC) in the Colombian páramos. Focusing on the páramos surrounding the capital city of Bogotá, we reconstruct the historically changing relationship between cattle-farming campesino communities and the Andean bear, Tremarctos ornatus. Using ethnographic and historical research methods, we conceptualise this relationship as embedded in localised landscapes and multispecies assemblages, in which scientists, conservation practitioners, water infrastructures, public environmental agencies, and cows participate as well. This article demonstrates that in-sufficient attention to the practices and relationships of historically marginalised humans and non-humans in the management of HWCs contributes to new dynamics of exclusion and friction, and can reduce the effectiveness of conservation programmes. We conclude that opening up conservation to the interests and knowledges of local communities is imperative in moving towards more historically informed, pluralistic and effective conservation strategies.

Original language	English
Article number	10489
Number of pages	18
Journal	Sustainability
Volume	13
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910489
Publication status	Published - 22 Sept 2021

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

10.3390/su131910489Licence: CC BY

Oso, Osito ¿A Qué Venís? Andean Bear Conflict, Conservation, and Campesinos in the Colombian Páramos
© 2021 by the authors
Final published version, 748 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{badd93a288b14baeb516e45a7e58350c,

title = "Oso, osito ¿a qu{\'e} ven{\'i}s? Andean Bear Conflict, Conservation and Campesinos in the Colombian P{\'a}ramos",

abstract = "This article proposes a historical, multispecies and ontological approach to human-wildlife conflict (HWC) in the Colombian p{\'a}ramos. Focusing on the p{\'a}ramos surrounding the capital city of Bogot{\'a}, we reconstruct the historically changing relationship between cattle-farming campesino communities and the Andean bear, Tremarctos ornatus. Using ethnographic and historical research methods, we conceptualise this relationship as embedded in localised landscapes and multispecies assemblages, in which scientists, conservation practitioners, water infrastructures, public environmental agencies, and cows participate as well. This article demonstrates that in-sufficient attention to the practices and relationships of historically marginalised humans and non-humans in the management of HWCs contributes to new dynamics of exclusion and friction, and can reduce the effectiveness of conservation programmes. We conclude that opening up conservation to the interests and knowledges of local communities is imperative in moving towards more historically informed, pluralistic and effective conservation strategies.",

author = "{Garrido Corredor}, {Ana Maria} and Cottyn, {Hanne Dominique Geertrui Jeannine} and {Martinez Medina}, Santiago and Christopher Wheatley and Adriana Sanchez and Kirshner, {Joshua Daniel} and Cowie, {Helen Louise} and Touza, {Julia M.} and White, {Piran Crawfurd Limond}",

note = "{\textcopyright} 2021 by the authors",

year = "2021",

month = sep,

day = "22",

doi = "10.3390/su131910489",

language = "English",

volume = "13",

journal = "Sustainability",

issn = "2071-1050",

publisher = "MDPI AG",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Oso, osito ¿a qué venís? Andean Bear Conflict, Conservation and Campesinos in the Colombian Páramos

AU - Garrido Corredor, Ana Maria

AU - Cottyn, Hanne Dominique Geertrui Jeannine

AU - Martinez Medina, Santiago

AU - Wheatley, Christopher

AU - Sanchez, Adriana

AU - Kirshner, Joshua Daniel

AU - Cowie, Helen Louise

AU - Touza, Julia M.

AU - White, Piran Crawfurd Limond

PY - 2021/9/22

Y1 - 2021/9/22

N2 - This article proposes a historical, multispecies and ontological approach to human-wildlife conflict (HWC) in the Colombian páramos. Focusing on the páramos surrounding the capital city of Bogotá, we reconstruct the historically changing relationship between cattle-farming campesino communities and the Andean bear, Tremarctos ornatus. Using ethnographic and historical research methods, we conceptualise this relationship as embedded in localised landscapes and multispecies assemblages, in which scientists, conservation practitioners, water infrastructures, public environmental agencies, and cows participate as well. This article demonstrates that in-sufficient attention to the practices and relationships of historically marginalised humans and non-humans in the management of HWCs contributes to new dynamics of exclusion and friction, and can reduce the effectiveness of conservation programmes. We conclude that opening up conservation to the interests and knowledges of local communities is imperative in moving towards more historically informed, pluralistic and effective conservation strategies.

AB - This article proposes a historical, multispecies and ontological approach to human-wildlife conflict (HWC) in the Colombian páramos. Focusing on the páramos surrounding the capital city of Bogotá, we reconstruct the historically changing relationship between cattle-farming campesino communities and the Andean bear, Tremarctos ornatus. Using ethnographic and historical research methods, we conceptualise this relationship as embedded in localised landscapes and multispecies assemblages, in which scientists, conservation practitioners, water infrastructures, public environmental agencies, and cows participate as well. This article demonstrates that in-sufficient attention to the practices and relationships of historically marginalised humans and non-humans in the management of HWCs contributes to new dynamics of exclusion and friction, and can reduce the effectiveness of conservation programmes. We conclude that opening up conservation to the interests and knowledges of local communities is imperative in moving towards more historically informed, pluralistic and effective conservation strategies.

U2 - 10.3390/su131910489

DO - 10.3390/su131910489

M3 - Article

SN - 2071-1050

VL - 13

JO - Sustainability

JF - Sustainability

M1 - 10489

ER -