Abstract
For the last two decades, researchers have worked independently to automate protein model building, and four widely used software pipelines have been developed for this purpose: ARP/wARP, Buccaneer, Phenix AutoBuild and SHELXE. Here, the usefulness of combining these pipelines to improve the built protein structures by running them in pairwise combinations is examined. The results show that integrating these pipelines can lead to significant improvements in structure completeness and Rfree. In particular, running Phenix AutoBuild after Buccaneer improved structure completeness for 29% and 75% of the data sets that were examined at the original resolution and at a simulated lower resolution, respectively, compared with running Phenix AutoBuild on its own. In contrast, Phenix AutoBuild alone produced better structure completeness than the two pipelines combined for only 7% and 3% of these data sets.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 814-823 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Acta Crystallographica Section D: Structural Biology |
Volume | 76 |
Issue number | 9 |
Early online date | 19 Aug 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2020 |
Keywords
- model building
- software
- structure solution
Datasets
-
Pairwise running of automated crystallographic model-building pipelines
Cowtan, K. (Supervisor) & Alharbi, E. (Creator), University of York, 10 Aug 2020
DOI: 10.15124/4b7c880a-d6b0-471a-a379-d52c4ee947fe, https://webfiles.york.ac.uk/INFODATA/4b7c880a-d6b0-471a-a379-d52c4ee947fe and one more link, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (show fewer)
Dataset