Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters vs Peripheral Cannulas for Delivering Parenteral Nutrition in Neonates

Sean B Ainsworth; William McGuire

doi:10.1001/jama.2016.7020

Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters vs Peripheral Cannulas for Delivering Parenteral Nutrition in Neonates

Sean B Ainsworth, William McGuire

The Hull York Medical School

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

CLINICAL QUESTION: Is parenteral nutrition via peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) associated with better delivery of nutrition and growth and fewer adverse events compared with short peripheral cannulas in neonates?

BOTTOM LINE: Compared with short peripheral cannulas, parenteral nutrition via PICCs is associated with better nutrient delivery and lower rates of subsequent catheters or cannulas placed and is not associated with increased rates of invasive infection.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	2612-2613
Number of pages	2
Journal	JAMA
Volume	315
Issue number	23
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.7020
Publication status	Published - 21 Jun 2016

Bibliographical note

Copyright 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details

Keywords

Catheterization, Central Venous
Catheterization, Peripheral
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Parenteral Nutrition

Access to Document

10.1001/jama.2016.7020

jes160004
Copyright 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details
Final published version, 106 KB

Cite this

@article{a1aed80d9799463a9f6b10e7a5e453b5,

title = "Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters vs Peripheral Cannulas for Delivering Parenteral Nutrition in Neonates",

abstract = "CLINICAL QUESTION: Is parenteral nutrition via peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) associated with better delivery of nutrition and growth and fewer adverse events compared with short peripheral cannulas in neonates?BOTTOM LINE: Compared with short peripheral cannulas, parenteral nutrition via PICCs is associated with better nutrient delivery and lower rates of subsequent catheters or cannulas placed and is not associated with increased rates of invasive infection.",

keywords = "Catheterization, Central Venous, Catheterization, Peripheral, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Parenteral Nutrition",

author = "Ainsworth, {Sean B} and William McGuire",

note = "Copyright 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher{\textquoteright}s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details",

year = "2016",

month = jun,

day = "21",

doi = "10.1001/jama.2016.7020",

language = "English",

volume = "315",

pages = "2612--2613",

journal = "JAMA",

issn = "0098-7484",

publisher = "American Medical Association",

number = "23",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters vs Peripheral Cannulas for Delivering Parenteral Nutrition in Neonates

AU - Ainsworth, Sean B

AU - McGuire, William

N1 - Copyright 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher’s self-archiving policy. Further copying may not be permitted; contact the publisher for details

PY - 2016/6/21

Y1 - 2016/6/21

N2 - CLINICAL QUESTION: Is parenteral nutrition via peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) associated with better delivery of nutrition and growth and fewer adverse events compared with short peripheral cannulas in neonates?BOTTOM LINE: Compared with short peripheral cannulas, parenteral nutrition via PICCs is associated with better nutrient delivery and lower rates of subsequent catheters or cannulas placed and is not associated with increased rates of invasive infection.

AB - CLINICAL QUESTION: Is parenteral nutrition via peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) associated with better delivery of nutrition and growth and fewer adverse events compared with short peripheral cannulas in neonates?BOTTOM LINE: Compared with short peripheral cannulas, parenteral nutrition via PICCs is associated with better nutrient delivery and lower rates of subsequent catheters or cannulas placed and is not associated with increased rates of invasive infection.

KW - Catheterization, Central Venous

KW - Catheterization, Peripheral

KW - Humans

KW - Infant, Newborn

KW - Parenteral Nutrition

U2 - 10.1001/jama.2016.7020

DO - 10.1001/jama.2016.7020

M3 - Article

C2 - 27327804

SN - 0098-7484

VL - 315

SP - 2612

EP - 2613

JO - JAMA

JF - JAMA

IS - 23

ER -